Anarchy after Leftism

References
References Adams, Robert M. . Decadent Societies. San Francisco, CA: North Point Press Adorno, Theodor W. . “Punctuation Marks.” The Antioch Review (Summer): 300–305 Andrieux, Maurice . Daily Life in Venice in the Time of Casanova. New York & Washington, DC: Praeger Publisher [Anonymous] . Review of The Rise of Urbanization and the Decline of Citizenship, by Murray Bookchin. Orbis: A Journal of World Affairs 32 (Fall): 628 [Anonymous] . Review of Social Anarchism or Lifestyle Anarchism: An Unbridgeable Chasm, by Murray Bookchin. Green Anarchist 42 (Summer): 22–23 Ansell-Pearson, Keith .An Introduction to Nietzsche as Political Thinker: The Perfect Nihilist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Apter, David E., & James Joll, eds. . Anarchism Today. Garden City, NY: Anch... (From : TheAnarchistLibrary.org.)

Chapter 11 : Anarchy After Leftism
Chapter 11: Anarchy after Leftism In one respect, Murray Bookchin is right in almost the only way he’s still capable of, i.e., for the wrong reasons. The anarchists are at a turning point. For the first time in history, they are the only revolutionary current. To be sure, not all anarchists are revolutionaries, but it is no longer possible to be a revolutionary without being an anarchist, in fact if not in name. Throughout its existence as a conscious current, anarchism has been shadowed and usually overshadowed by leftism in general, and Marxism in particular. Especially since the formation of the Soviet Union, anarchism has effectively (and therefore ineffectively) defined itself with reference to Marxism. The reduction of anarchists to satellites of the Communists, especially in revolutionary situations, is so regular a feature of their modern history that it can’t be an accident. Fixated on their great rival, the anarc... (From : TheAnarchistLibrary.org.)

Chapter 10 : Shut Up, Marxist!
Chapter 10: Shut Up, Marxist! As a matter of course, unless ideology withers away, it eventually hardens into dogma. After Jesus comes Paul, and eventually some Pope, Innocent in name only. That Bookchinism would calcify into a creed after no very long time is no surprise. Even in its prime it was arthritic with Rousseau, St.-Simon, Marx and Arendt. It was always ambiguous about technology and scarcity. Its ecological content was always at odds with its civism, to which, in retrospect, ecology seems to have always been an accessory, an add-on. It’s marred by eccentricities as various as primitive gerontocracy and Swiss anarchy. It’s unredeemed by irony, much less humor. What’s amazing is that Bookchin isn’t leaving Bookchinism to its Plekhanovs, Kautskys and Lenins. He’s vulgarizing his ideology himself. As the Green Anarchist reviewer observes, the Dean now “goes on to crudely reduce or reject all that&rsqu... (From : TheAnarchistLibrary.org.)

Chapter 9 : From Primitive Affluence to Labor-Enslaving Technology
Chapter 9: From Primitive Affluence to Labor-Enslaving Technology One tendency which surely belongs on the Dean’s enemies short list is zero-work, the critique of work as such, “the notion that the abolition of work is possible and desirable: that genuine, unconditioned needs can be met by voluntary playlike activity enjoyed for its own sake” (Black 1996d: 22). Zero-work may well be the only programmatic position shared by everybody the Dean targets, even L. Susan Brown . The Left That Was not only posited work as a necessity, it regarded it as almost a sacrament. And while zero-work is not the same thing as such Bookchin bugbears as hedonism and primitivism, it complements them nicely. It is an important Bookchin target, but he attacks it with potshots, not the usual scattershot. There may be several reasons for his uncharacteristic circumspection. In his younger days (“younger” being, of course, a relative... (From : TheAnarchistLibrary.org.)

Chapter 8 : In Search of the Primitivists Part II: Primitive Affluence
Chapter 8: In Search of the Primitivists Part II: Primitive Affluence According to the Dean, the notion of primitive affluence is some silliness the hippies smoked up and put over on the anthropologists in the ‘60s: Much of [George Bradford’s] “critical anthropology” appears to derive from ideas propounded at the “Man the Hunter” symposium, convened in April 1966 at the University of Chicago. Although most of the papers contributed to this symposium were immensely valuable, a number of them conformed to the naive mystification of “primitivity” that was percolating through the 1960s counter-culture — and that lingers on to this day. The hippie culture, which influenced quite a few anthropologists of the time, averred that hunting-gathering peoples today had been bypassed by the social and economic forces at work in the rest of the world and still lived in a pristine state, as isolated remnants... (From : TheAnarchistLibrary.org.)

Murray Bookchin, Municipal Statist
Chapter 5: Murray Bookchin, Municipal Statist There is no putting off the inevitable any longer. It has to be said: Dean Bookchin is not an anarchist. By this I do not mean that he is not my kind of anarchist, although that too is true. I mean he is not any kind of anarchist. The word means something, after all, and what it means is denial of the necessity and desirability of government. That’s a bare- bones, pre-adjectival definition anterior to any squabbling about individualist, collectivist, communist, mutualist, social, lifestyle, ecological, mystical, rational, primitivist, Watsonian, ontological, etc. anarchisms. An anarchist as such is opposed to government — full stop. Dean Bookchin is not opposed to government. Consequ... (From : TheAnarchistLibrary.org.)

On Organization
Chapter 4: On Organization Well, finally, the Dean has identified a concrete “programmatic” difference between him and his appointed enemies. Most, maybe all of those he criticizes as “lifestyle anarchists” indeed oppose the establishment of some sort of authoritative anarchist organization, as well they should (Black 1992:1 181–193). It is something North American anarchists have always shied away from, even in the heyday of the Left That Was. The Dean, as previously noted, has spent his entire anarchist life going out of his way not to involve himself with any such organization — not from principle, apparently, but because he was preoccupied, personalistically, with his own career. Some of us think the ... (From : TheAnarchistLibrary.org.)

Lifestyle Anarchism
Chapter 3: Lifestyle Anarchism As fast-and-loose as the Dean plays with the word “individualism,” extrapolating it to something he calls “lifestyle anarchism” is, to borrow a phrase from Jeremy Bentham not just nonsense, it is nonsense on stilts. Here is how he does the stretch: In the traditionally individualist-liberal United States and Britain, the 1990s are awash in self-styled [that word again!] anarchists who — their flamboyant radical rhetoric aside — are cultivating a latter-day anarcho-individualism that I will call lifestyle anarchism.... Ad hoc adventurism, personal bravura, an aversion to theory oddly akin to the antirational biases of postmodernism, celebrations of theoretical incoherence (pl... (From : TheAnarchistLibrary.org.)

Reason and Revolution
Chapter 6: Reason and Revolution The Dean denounces lifestyle anarchists for succumbing to the reactionary intellectual currents of the last quarter century, such as irrationalism (1–2, 9, 55–56 & passim). He laments the Stirnerist “farewell to objective reality” an the disdain for “reason as such” . With his usual self-absorption sans self-awareness, Bookchin fails to notice that he is echoing the right-wing rhetoric which since the 60’s has denounced the treason of the intellectuals, their betrayal of reason and truth. There was a time when Bookchin “dismissed out of hand” the way the “bourgeois critics” condemned 60’s youth culture as “anti-rational” ... (From : TheAnarchistLibrary.org.)

What is Individualist Anarchism?
Chapter 2: What is Individualist Anarchism? Dean Bookchin posits an eternally recurring “tension” within anarchism between the individual and the social . As this is none other than the central conundrum of Western political philosophy, the Dean is neither original nor — more important — has he identified a specifically anarchist tension. He goes on to identify the antitheses within anarchism as “two basically contradictory tendencies: a personalistic commitment to individual autonomy and a collectivist commitment to social freedom” . This is the “unbridgeable chasm” his book title refers to. If the Dean is right — that individual autonomy and social liberation are not just in tension bu... (From : TheAnarchistLibrary.org.)