,ESPECIFISMO & ,SYN!SIS_/,SYN!SISM ,PEOPLE 3 ,AU?OR 3 ,FELIPE ,CORREA ,TEXT 3 ,ESPECIFISMO ,ESPECIFISMO IS A CONCEPTION ( AN>*I/ ORGANIZATION4 ,! T]M IS US$ & WAS FIR/ ADVOCAT$ BY ! ,URUGUAYAN ,AN>*I/ ,F$]ATION 7,F,A,U71 ) :I* IT REF]S TO ! AN>*I/ CURR5T ?AT HI/ORICALLY DEF5D$ ! NE$ = SPECIFIC AN>*I/ ORGANIZATION4 ,?US1 ! SPECIFIC ORGANIZATION BELIEVES ?AT ! /RUGGLE MU/ TAKE PLACE ON TWO DI/9CT LEVELS3 ?AT ( ! AN>*I/ ORGANIZATION & ?AT ( ! POPUL> MOVEM5TS -- :I* MU/ =M ON ! BASIS ( NE$ & NOT BE RE/RICT$ TO A P>TICUL> IDEOLOGY AS 9 ! CASE ( AN>*O-SYNDICALISM4 ,?IS MODEL ( ORGANIZATION HAS ITS F\NDATIONS 9 CLASSICAL AN>*ISM1 AS HAS BE5 ADVOCAT$ BY ,MIKHAIL ,BAKUN91 ,]RICO ,MALATE/A1 ! ,DIELO ,TRUDA ,RUSSIAN EXILES1 AMONG O!RS4 ,BAKUN9 ADVOCAT$ SU* A MODEL = ! ,ALLIANCE ( ,SOCIALI/ ,DEMOCRACY1 :5 9 HIS ROLE )9 ! ,9T]NATIONAL ,WORK]S ,ASSOCIATION 7,I,W,A71 ,MALATE/A ADVOCAT$ SIMIL> POSITIONS 9 HIS =MULATION ( ! 0AN>*I/ P>TY01 &1 SIMIL>LY1 ,DIELO ,TRUDA 9 ! ,ORGANIZATIONAL ,PLAT=M ( ! ,LIB]T>IAN ,COMMUNI/S4 ,SIMIL> POSITIONS W]E ADVOCAT$ AT DIFF]5T TIMES & 9 DIFF]5T PLACES BY AN>*I/-COMMUNI/S :O HELD AN 0ORGANISATIONALI/0 L9E ( AN>*ISM1 BAS$ ON ! ORGANIZATION & WILL+NESS ( WORK]S TO PROMOTE SOCIAL *ANGE ?R\< MASS MOVEM5TS4 ,S9CE ! N9ETE5? C5TURY1 O!R CONCEPTS HAVE BE5 9CORPORAT$ 9TO :AT TODAY IS CONSID]$ TO BE ! 0ESPECIFISMO0 ?AT IS ADVOCAT$ BY A NUMB] ( AN>*I/ ORGANIZATIONS 9 ,LAT9 ,AM]ICA3 ! UND]/&+ ( AN>*ISM AS AN IDEOLOGY &1 !RE=E1 A NECESS>Y CONNECTION ) A POLITICAL PRACTICE ) ! GOAL ( SOCIAL TRANS=MATION2 ORGANIZATION AS AN 9DISP5SABLE ELEM5T 9 ! /RUGGLE2 ! DESIGN ( ! SPECIFIC AN>*I/ ORGANIZATION AS AN ORGANIZATION ( AN ACTIVE M9ORITY2 ! C5TRALITY ( CLASS /RUGGLE & ! PRIORITY = SOCIAL WORK ) ! POPUL> MOVEM5TS 7SOCIAL MOVEM5TS1 TRADE UNIONS1 ETC44 72 !ORETICAL & IDEOLOGICAL UNITY2 UNIFI$ /RATEGY & TACTICS2 A DECISION-MAK+ PROCESS M>K$ BY ! ATTEMPT AT CONS5SUS1 & FAIL+ ?AT1 BY ! VOTE2 & ! EMPHASIS ON ! COMMITM5T ( MILITANTS4 ,\TSIDE ,LAT9 ,AM]ICA1 ! ORGANIZATIONS ?AT ADVOCATE SIMIL> POSITIONS TO ?AT ( ,ESPECIFISMO DEF9E !MSELVES AS AN>*I/-COMMUNI/S -- ( ,PLAT=MI/ 9SPIRATION4 ,SYN!SIS_/,SYN!SISM ,! DISCUSSION AB\T ! ,AN>*I/ ,SYN!SIS >ISES 9 ! CONTEXT ( ! DISCUSSION ON ! ,ORGANIZATIONAL ,PLAT=M ( ! ,LIB]T>IAN ,COMMUNI/S1 WRITT5 BY ! ,DIELO ,TRUDA GR\P ( ,RUSSIAN EXILES 9 #a#i#b#f4 ,TWO TEXTS MADE AS RESPONSES TO ! ,PLAT=M1 EA* PROPOS+ DIFF]5T MODELS1 >E ! BASIS = :AT BECAME KN[N AS ! ORGANIZATION ( SYN!SIS1 OR SIMPLY 0SYN!SISM40 ,! FIR/ TEXT1 BY ,SEBA/I5 ,FAURE1 WAS WRITT5 9 #aibh & MA9TA9S ?AT AN>*ISM IS *>ACT]IZ$ BY ?REE FUNDAM5TAL CURR5TS3 AN>*O-SYNDICALISM1 LIB]T>IAN COMMUNISM & AN>*O-9DIVIDUALISM4 ,9 HIS VIEW1 !SE CURR5TS W]E NOT CONTRADICTORY BUT COMPLEM5T>Y1 EA* HAV+ A ROLE )9 AN>*ISM3 AN>*O-SYNDICALISM AS ! /R5G? ( ! MASS ORGANIZATIONS & ! BE/ WAY = ! PRACTICE ( AN>*ISM2 LIB]T>IAN COMMUNISM AS A PROPOS$ FUTURE SOCIETY BAS$ ON ! DI/RIBUTION ( ! FRUITS ( LABOR ACCORD+ TO ! NE$S ( EA* ONE2 AN>*O-9DIVIDUALISM AS A NEGATION ( OPPRESSION & AFFIRM+ ! 9DIVIDUAL RIY TO SYN!SIZE ! V>I\S AN>*I/ CURR5TS 9 A 0H>MONI\S1 ORD]$1 F9I%$0 WAY4 ,MODEL$ ON ! L9ES ?AT W]E 9T5D$ TO CON/RUCT ! ,NABAT ,RUSSIAN AN>*I/ ORGANIZATION1 ,VOL91 SIMIL>LY TO ,FAURE1 DEM&S A MODEL ( ORGANIZATION 9 :I* UNIONISM IS CONSID]$ ! ME?OD ( SOCIAL REVOLUTION1 LIB]T>IAN COMMUNISM CON/ITUTES ! ORGANIZATION ( ! NEW SOCIETY1 & 9DIVIDUALISM BECOMES ! GOAL ( PO/-REVOLUTION>Y SOCIETY1 AIM+ AT ! EMANCIPATION & HAPP9ESS ( ! 9DIVIDUAL4 ,= HIM1 IT W\LD BE A MI/AKE TO OPPOSE ! AN>*I/ CURR5TS AGA9/ EA* O!R1 & MORE PRODUCTIVE W\LD BE TO M]GE !M 9TO A 0SYN!TIC AN>*ISM01 ESS5TIAL 9 HIS VIEW4 ,CURR5TLY1 ! AN>*I/ SYS!SIS ORGANIZATION ( GREATE/ EXPRESSION IS ! ,AN>*I/ ,F$]ATION 7,F,A7 ( ,FRANCE4 7,S\RCE3 ,RETRIEV$ ON #a#d? ,OCTOB] #bba FROM WWW4AN>KISMO4NET47 ,FROM 3 ,!,AN>*I/,LIBR>Y4ORG4 ,*RONOLOGY 3 ,JANU>Y #a#e1 #bbb 3 ,ESPECIFISMO & ,SYN!SIS_/,SYN!SISM -- ,ADD$4 FILE G5]AT$ FROM 3 HTTP3_/_/REVOLTLIB4COM_/