,! ,CODE ( ! ,KEY-,ORD] ,PEOPLE 3 ,AU?OR 3 ,F$]ICO ,BUONO ,TEXT 3 ,9,T,R,O,D,U,C,T,I,O,N ,9 ?IS TEXT1 & 9 A CONT9U$ ,EGOI/ ,POLEMIC1 ,I'M GO+ TO DWELL ON ! COMPLEX ME*ANISMS ( COMP>ISON BETWE5 9DIVIDUAL & LAW4 ,NO?+ COMPLETE OR ALREADY WRITT5 - BY SAY+ SO ,I 9T5D TO 5UNCIATE ! FAIRYTALE ( ! CONCRET5ESS ( ! JURIDICAL AN>*I/ - & ! ,NIHILI/ HOLDS A DAGG] 9 HIS H&1 :I* DE/ROYS C]TITUDES6 ,9 ! FRAGM5TS WE MOV$ ON A GR\ND ( EGOI/ EXP]IM5TATION ( ! METAPHOR4 ,9 ?IS TEXT METAPHOR IS PRES5T 9 P>T - TO SPECIFY ! FRAGM5TATION ?AT 'OCCURS' :5 ONE OV]/EPS A METAPHORICAL LABYR9?4 ,9 DEVELOP+ AN ANTI-JURIDICAL NON-TRAJECTORY ) TEXTS EXP]I5C$ ) BLOOD ALONG ) MY PR\D & AFF9ITY COMRADE ,MAURIZIO1 WE POS$ ! ANNIHILATOR ATTACK ON ! USE ( ! LAW4 ,AS SPECIFI$ ABOVE1 SOMETIMES ! COMPLEX ME*ANISM ( ! LAW 9 SOCIETY DOES NOT ALL[ ONE TO C>RY \T A LUCID & SPECIFIC EXAM9ATION ( ! COMPLEM5T>Y RULES 9 AN 9TEGRATION SUBORD9AT+ ! 9DIVIDUAL 9 LIV+ ! PROC$URAL & PROGRAMMATIC ESS5CE 9H]5T TO ! COMMUNITY-ORD]4 ,?IS TEXT ALSO TALKS AB\T ! 9VE/IGATION ( NUN ,COMODI - :I* ALSO CONC]NS ME = #b#gBIS4 ,I WANT TO SPECIFY ?AT = NO REASON & 9 NO WAY WILL ,I ABDICATE & TRANS=M AN 9VE/IGATION 9TO A M]E 9/RUM5T ( SALVATION BY *OOS+ A TE*NICAL OR A POLITICAL TRIAL - AS ! LATT] IS A DEVICE ( ASSIMILATION 9 ! COMPLY+ USE ( ! ,P>ABOLA ,OPE-,LEGIS4 ,! ,NIHILI/ ATTACK DOES NOT KN[ BORD]S ?AT KNITS ONE'S [N PA?1 & 9 ! CONT9U\S SE>* = A WILL+ MOVEM5T ?AT - 9 ! *OS5 MOM5T - D5IES ! LAW - BY COLLID+ ) ! AU?ORITY 9 *>GE ( ! LAW - ) ! LEGALLY RECOGNIZ$ CITIZ5 - & ) ?OSE :O *OOSE JURISPRUD5CE AS =MA M5TIS 9 ! E?ICAL DEF5SE ( !IR R$EMPTION4 ,I D$ICATE !SE L9ES TO ! ATTACK]S ( ! ,9=MAL ,AN>*I/ ,F$]ATION ,OLGA ,NUCLEUS6 ,LONG LIVE ! ,BLACK ,9T]NATIONAL6 "9 "9 "9 ,! LAW1 ! RADICALLY DIFF]5T =MULATION ( C]TA9 CONDITIONS ( CONS]VATION ( A COMMUNITY1 =BIDS C]TA9 ACTIONS TURN+ TO A DEF9$ DIRECTION1 ?AT IS TO SAY :5 !Y TURN TO ! DETRIM5T ( ! COMMUNITY3 IT DOES NOT =BID ! DISPOSITION ( M9D G5]AT+ !SE ACTIONS - BECAUSE IT NE$S SU* ACTIONS1 BUT ONLY IF !Y TURN TO ANO!R DIRECTION1 I4E4 AGA9/ ! 5EMIES ( ! COMMUNITY4 ',A CRITIQUE ( SUPREME VALUES' - ',WILL TO P[]'1 ,F4 ,NIETZS*E ,! MISAN?ROPIC ADVANC+ ( DE/RUCTION IS ! DISCORDANT PIVOT ( ! ,NIHILI/ ACTION3 ,! ,C5TRIC-,EGO IS ! TRANSMITT] ( ,S+UL> P[]4 ,IRREGUL> BEG9N+ ( PLEASURE - ! ,NIHILI/ ACTION ( ATTACK DOES NOT ID5TIFY ! NORMALIZ+ RETREAT ( ! AN>*I/ EXCULPATORY DET]M9ISM 9 A JUDICIAL CONTEXT4 ,9/ABLE FLUX 9 AN 9CESSANT T5SION - IT LONGS = P]SEV]ANT CONFLICT1 DEBAU*]Y ?AT D5IES ! LAW4 ,! ADJO9+ ( :AT CAN BE COMMUNICAT$ IS ! 5EMY TO BE ANNIHILAT$ 9 ! SE>* = COLLISION & P5ETRATION ( ! VACU\S & 9DET]M9ABLE ORGANIC-/RUCTURAL JURIDICAL BODY4 ,! METAPHORS EXPRESS$ 9 ! TEXTS ,AMORAL ,ANTI-JURIDICAL- ',! TEMPLE ( PROPHECY' & ',IMP$+ ,RIGOR ,MORTIS' /& \T 9 A VACU\S HORIZON CONSUM$ 9 A CORRECTIONAL RIS 9 RUNN+ ! ,/ATE-=C$ 9DIVIDUAL4 ,TO ESCAPE ) M9D & BODY BECOMES A /]ILE & USELESS SUCCESSION ( P5ETRATION 9 AN EPIDEICTIC =MUL>Y ( PROC$URE4 ,! UND]WRIT+ 9/ANCE 9 ! 'CROSS+' IS ! CONDITION ?AT MANIFE/S ITSELF 9 AN 9/ANCE AIM$ AT A*IEV+ ! COMP5SATORY PUNI%M5T ( REP5TANCE4 ,TO 5T] & TO GO BEYOND ! MAZY NET ( CODES-ORD]S PR$ET]M9ES ! PROC$URAL SCANSION 9 CODIFI$ RULES4 ,ANY PRES5T_/ABS5T R$EMPTIVE CELL APPE>S DE=M$ & UNRECOGNIZABLE 9 ! ACT ( OV]/EPP+1 9 A DESIRE TO CON=M ?AT LONGS = ! ASSUMPTION ( ! LEAD+ KEY3 ,! KEY OP5S- ! KEY CLOSES4 ,9 A SUCCESSION ( P]=M$ ACTS ! REPRES5TATIONS ( ! LEAD+ =M & ( ! ,DEMIURGE APPE> 9 REFLECTIONS CONCAT5AT+ ! COVET$ OBJECT3 ,! KEY CLOSES BY OP5+4 ,! EV5T DET]M9ES ! EV5TUALITY ( MOV+ 9SIDE ! LABYR9?4 ,! TIME & PLACE ( ! PROCESSION = ! REMOVAL ( ANY AMORAL FRAGM5T >E ! AFFIRMATION-SYN!SIS DECID$ BY ?OSE :O R$EEM ! S9S4 ,! AFFIRMATION IS ! CONCRETE COMPLEM5T>Y RECIPROCAL 9T]PRETATION BETWE5 AN ELECT$ TIME & A GIV5 PLACE4 ,! PR9CIPLE 9 DEVICE IS ! /RUCTURE ( RULES GOV]N+ ! CRIM9AL CODE4 ,! 9DIVIDUAL UND] JUDGM5T MOVES T[>DS ! SOLV+ RITE & GOES ?R\< ! PA?S ( ! WEB ( CODE-ORD] 9 ! LABYR9? ( ! LAW4 ,! ISSU$ ORD] APPE>S H>MONI\S 9 A PYRAMID-%AP$ /RUCTURE4 ,ANY P>AMET] 9CURS 9 ! REPRES5TATION PRESCRIB$ BY ! ,DEMIURGE4 ,! CONDITIONS ( APPE>ANCE AFFIRM ! COMPLETE =MULATION ( ! LAW - 9 A SUCCUMB+ & DEF9ITE 'BODY'4 ,! C]EMONIAL PROC$URE IS 9 A BALANCE H>MONIZ$ 9 AN IMBALANCE-SPECULAT$ VISION ( ! 9DIVIDUAL AS A PRISON] 9 ! METAPHOR ( ! ,TEMPLE ( PROPHECY4 ,! P>ABOLA ,OPE-,LEGIS BECOMES ! MEAN+ & CONCEPT 9 AN ELECT$ TIME 9 ! EV5T ( ! O/5SIVE C]EMONY4 ,IMPORTANTLY ! /RUCTURE E/ABLI%ES ACTS ( JUDICIAL-DISPOS$ DEF9ITION 9 ! 'PROPHESIZ$' 9DIVIDUAL4 ,EXPOSITION & TRANSMUTATION 9 PA?S E/ABLI%$ 9SIDE A CONT9U\S CYCLE ( 'SIDE' ROADS 7BUT ! *OICE ( LEGAL DEF5SE IS ALREADY A *OICE 'ACCORD+' TO ! ASSUMPTION ( /ABILITY7 - PREPOND]ANT TO ! CORE ( ! ESS5CE ( ! PROPHETIC ,TEMPLE - CREATE ! *A9$ CONC5TRATION 9 A PROCESS ID5TIFI$ AS A BACKW>D-=W>D ESCAPE ( IMP$+ ,RIGOR ,MORTIS4 ,TO BE PRES5T ?R\< VEHICUL> M$IA BECOMES ! OBS]VATION ( ! ,DEMIURGE1 :O EXPOSES HIS 5COD$ RITE ?R\< 'IMAGES' ATTA*$ TO ! 'WALL' 7IT HAS YET TO BE DET]M9$3 :AT 9TR9SIC MEAN+ DOES ?IS O!R METAPHOR HAVE 9 A CRIM9AL PROC$URE87 ( ! CONC5TRIC & ILLUSORY WALL 9 A NON-C5TRIC VISION ( ! METAPHORICAL C\RT-LABYR9?4 ,MULTIPLE & IMAG9ATIVE ADULAT+ ABILITIES MAKE ! /RUCTURE ( ! LABYR9? AN 9DUCTION 9 /RATIFI$ =MULATIONS ( A PRES5T-ABS5T 9 ! PROCESS ANNIHILAT+ ! 9DIVIDUAL ON CRIM9AL TRIAL4 ,! SYN!TIC PROCESS ( ASSIMILATION MODULATES ! BELONG+ ( ! DEF5DANT 9 A NECESS>Y M$IATION-M$ITATION ?R\< ! DI/URB+ & ALLUSIVE P[] ( ! ,DEMIURGE4 ,! REFLEX ( ! CONC5TRIC WALL 9 A NON C5TRIC HALLUC9ATION BREAKS 9TO ! ESS5CE ( ! SUBORD9AT$ BODY 9 ! C]EMONIAL RITE4 ,! REFLEX SE5 BY ! DEF5DANT DOES NOT REFLECT HIS BE+ S5SITIVE & ONLY D5OTES ! EFFECT GIV5 BY ! PRODUC+ REFLEX ( ! P[] ( ! ,DEMIURGE4 ,9 GO+ ?R\< ! METAPHORICAL C\RT-LABYR9?3 ',! DEF9ITION 0PA?0 IS 9DIVISIBLE 9 A FRACTION COMPOS$ 9 ! TIME C\RSE1 ALONG A BORD] COMPOS$ BETWE5 TIME C\RSE & COMM5C+ T]M 9 ! PASSAGE FROM ! LIMIT GIV+ A BORD] TO PRACTICABILITY'4 ,! SYMPTOM ( ! CURE :ILE 5T]+ ! LABYR9? ( ! LAW IS BE+ SPECIFICALLY DEF9$ 'DEF5DANT'4 ,! EV5T COMPOSES ! PHASES CONSEQU5TIAL TO ! CURE ?AT IT IMPOSES ON ?OSE :O HAVE SUBJECTIVELY SUBORD9AT$ TO JURIDICAL DISCIPL9E 9 A F\NDATION ( OBJECTIVITY4 ,GO+ BEYOND IS TO CLAIM AN ASSUMPTION ?AT COMPOSES ! TIME COMPLY+ ) ! E/ABLI%M5T ( ! REGULATION ( ! *OS5 PA? - 9 A PRONE PRO/RAT+ ONESELF 9 ! T]MS E/ABLI%$ BY JURISDICTIONAL CON=MITY 9 A MOV+ & UNWILL+LY L9E4 ,DIGRESSION IS ! BORD] PROB$ 9 SE>* ( A /RUCTURAL =M ?AT BECOMES & EXT5DS ITS F\NDATIONS BETWE5 A TIME LIMIT & A LIMIT+ T]M ( A LIMBO 9 A PROPHESIZ$ TEMPORALITY4' ,! LABYR9?-METAPHOR EXT5DS ! 9OCULATION ( ! =M-GUIDE ?AT BECOMES ! DIRECTIONAL =M1 9 :I* ! DEMOLITION ( ! SUBJECTIVE OBJECT ( ! KEY ?AT CLOSES BY OP5+ IS MADE VOID BY ! OCCURR+ *OS5 EV5T 7CRIM9AL PROC$URE IS ! SYMBOL EXPRESS+ ! GO+ T[>DS ! OCCLUSION ( ANY WILL+LY MOTION7 ?AT T5DS TO M>G9ALIZE ANY GLIMM] ( ESCAPE FROM ! EV5T ITSELF4 ,! *OICE IS NOT OPTIONAL BUT IT IS SUBORD9AT$ TO ! RELATIONAL =M 9/ITUT$ BY ! =M-GUIDE & ! IMP5ETRABLE ,DEMIURGE - :]E TIME IS LIMIT$ TO ! F\NDATION ( OBJECTIVITY ( ! KEY ?AT CLOSES BY OP5+ & ( A CLOSURE ( ! CODES ( CONDUCT CONSEQU5T TO ! TRIAL4 ,A CRIM9AL TRIAL E/ABLI%ES A PA? *OS5 BY ?OSE :O TRANS=M !MSELVES 9TO 'DEF5DANTS' - 9 ! TEMPORAL C5T] ( ! PROPHETIC ,TEMPLE4 ,N[ ! AXIOM IS DECOMPOS$4 ',N[ ! ID5TITY /RUCTURE /AYS AT ! 0C5T]0 ( A FATAL C]EMONY1 IS VISIBLE 9 A P]CEPTIVE MANN]1 EXPRESSES ! CL>IFY+ SIGNS 9 ! ESS5CE ( ! REPRES5TATION ( A SYMBOLIC REPRES5TATION 9 ! IMMAN5CE ( ! COM+ PROPHECY4' ,:AT A P]SON ON CRIM9AL TRIAL 'SEES' AS A DEF5DANT8 ,ONCE IT HAS BE5 9OCULAT$ ! COMPLEX & DIFFUS$ P5AL CODE 7?IS UNKN[N BOOK ( PROPHECY SECRETLY KEPT BY HUMAN SOCIETY - BUT 9COMPREH5SIBLE TO ?OSE :O >E AN>*I/S & RELY ON ! CURE ( !IR DOCTOR-LAWY]7 NULLIFIES ! ESS5CE ( ! ',OPE-,LEGIS' NUCLEUS & ALL MOTIONS 9VOLV+ S+UL>ITY4 ,9 HIS ?W>T$ EFFECT A DEF5DANT IS SURE HE HAS ! KEY OP5+ R$EMPTIVE HOPE 9 HIS H&S - BUT AS WRITT5 9 ! METAPHOR ! KEY1 IF IT OP5S1 CLOSES-OCCLUDES ANY ACT ATTEMPT+ ONE'S CONSCI5CE2 & EV5 IF IT OP5S AN ACQUITTAL IT CLOSES ! DISSOLUTION ( ANY FUNDAM5TAL VALUE ( MORALITY4 ,! CLOS] ! 5D ( ! TRIAL ! MORE ! 9TRUSION ( M$ICATION ASSUMES - 9 RELEVANT IMPORTANCE - ANY FIB] ( ! 9DIVIDUAL :O HAS *OS5 TO GO BEYOND ! 5TRANCE ( ! LABYR9?4 ,ESCAPE IS NECESS>Y - ESCAPE FROM ! *OS5 EV5T - BUT ESCAP+ IS NO LONG] COMP>ABLE TO ! DEF9ITION ( 'ESCAP+' 9 NEGATION ( ! CODE-LAW2 BUT IT IS ESCAP+ FROM ONE'S [N *OICES1 :I* ! MOM5T ( BECOM+ 9 ! *OS5 =M 9 A P>ADOX 9 COLLISION MAKES /ABLE & EFFECTIVE4 ,! OBJECTIVE CRIT]ION RESIDES 9 ! ID5TIFICATION NUCLEUS ( ! SUBJECT :O IS 'DEF5DANT'4 ,! PRES5T TRANS=MS ! NIE ( ! PA/ 9TO ! BECOM+ ( A COMPLEXITY ( EXPRESSIVE-LOGIC MODULATIONS 9 *OOS+ A *OS5 PA?4 ,! KEY ?AT CLOSES BY OP5+ 9 AN ESCAPE 9SIDE ! UNWILL+LY-WILL+LY ASSIMILATES ! TOTALIZ+ 'SUB/ANCE' >RANG$ BY ! =M-GUIDE4 ,! KEY OP5S ! LABYR9? :]E ! BECOM+ ( PR9CIPLES & CONCEPTS IS ! CLOSURE CODE ( ! LAW 9 AN 9TEGRAT$ =MULATION SYN*RONIC TO ! ACT ( GO+ BEYOND4 ,! P>ABOLA 9SCRIB$ 9 A PREP>ATORY PA? IS ! P5ALIZ$ REMISSION ( A PR$ET]M9$ CRIT]ION4 ,! =MAL ASSUMPTION 9 ! 'DEF5DANT' T]M9OLOGY3 ,BY READ+ A SIMPLE & D$UCTIVE 'COMP5DIUM ( CRIM9AL PROC$URAL LAW' 7?IS BOOK UNKN[N TO ! JUDICIAL AN>*I/71 ! 9VE/IGAT$ 9DIVIDUAL ACQUIRES ! ASSUMPTION ( ! *>ACT]I/IC ( 'DEF5DANT'4 ,ID5TIFICATION IS ! =MULA CORRESPOND+ TO ! ASSUMPTION ( BE+ *>ACT]IZ$4 ,H[ CAN ONE GET \T ( ?IS ASSUMPTION ( ACQUIR$ RESPONSIBILITY8 ,9 ! ,EGOI/ PAP] ,V]TEX ,ABYSS ! >TICULAT$ ATTEMPT AT ANNIHILAT+ ! VALUE ( ! LAW IS EXPOS$ ?R\< TEXTS & QUE/IONS 9 A COMPLEXITY ( DEEP5+4 ,! ORGANIC ACQUISITION POSES A DESIRE 9 ! NEGATION ( ! VALUE ( ! LAW AS A CONT9U\S CONTRADICTION BETWE5 UNLIMIT$ ,NIHILI/ ACTION ( ATTACK & AN OBVI\S RETURN TO A C]TA9 JURIDICAL EV5T1 UNCONCEIVABLE & NON DE/RUCTIBLE4 ,EV]Y TIME ONE GETS \T ( ! LAW ONE 5T]S A 'GIV5' LIMIT4 ,! METAPHOR ( ! 'KEY' IS 9TR9SIC MAT]IAL 9 A DISCIPL9$ PR9CIPLE ( =C$ R$EMPTION4 ,! RITICIPANTS AS 'DEF5DANTS'4 ,! 9DIVIDUAL DEF5DANT HAS ! RITICIPAT$ ACQUISITION BECOMES LIKE GO+ BEYOND ! LABYR9? AS ONE WANTS TO GET \T ( IT4 ,IF ONE REVOKES ONE'S LAWY]1 ! LAW GIVES ONE ! ACQUISITION ( BECOM+ DEF5DANT RA!R ?AN 9VE/IGAT$ - 9 AN EFFECTIVE RETURN TO ! *A9S ( JU/ICE4 ,H[ CAN ONE GET \T ( IT ONCE & = ALL8 ,WE REPRODUCE A PASSAGE ( ! 'COMP5DIUM ( CRIM9AL PROC$URAL LAW'3 ',A LAWY] IS A PURELY =MAL P>TY 9 ! S5SE ?AT ! SUB/ANTIAL 9T]E/ ( A TRIAL BELONGS TO ! CLI5T1 :O IS ! SUB/ANTIAL P>TY4' ,DOES ?IS MEAN ?AT TO GET A LAWY] 9VOLVES ?AT 9 ! 5D ! LATT] IS ONLY AN ASSI/ANT ( HE :O IS ON TRIAL8 ,9 ?IS WAY C\LD ! SACR$ AN>*I/ *UR* ( R$EMPTION SET ! S*EMATIC ORGANIZATION *>T 9 DEF5SE ( ! LAW 7! ,OPES-,LEGIS P>ABOLA-METAPHOR MIRI$ \T BY BELIEV+ 7BELIEF IS 9 ! P>ABOLAS ( ! SACR$ *UR* ( R$EMPTIVE AN>*Y7 9 ! NOTES ( A HYP]-COMP5DIUM4 ',! PROP5SITY PRODUC$ 9 AN ANALOGY BETWE5 A '/RET*$' 9 CLAIM+ & 'LEAN+' T[>DS ! (FICIAL LITURGICAL C]EMONY PREP>ES ! SIMULATION ( ! LEAD+ ROLE 9 A DISSIMULATION ( ! PREP>ATORY ACTS4' ,! SIMULATION COMPLY+ ) ! RESULT ( A TRIAL T5DS TO %[ ! FICTION 9 CLAIM+ 9 A HOMOG5IZATION ?AT CORRESPONDS TO ! ROLE ?AT EXT5DS ! ADMISSIBILITY ( ! ACT COMMUNICAT$ BY ! LAWY]4 ,LET'S GO BACK TO A SPECIFIC PASSAGE ( ! 'COMP5DIUM ( CRIM9AL PROC$URAL LAW' REG>D+ ! RIABOLA ,OPE-,LEGIS OCCURS4 ,! READ+ ( ! ABOVE M5TION$ COLORLESS NOTES CL>IFIES :AT A DEF5D] IS LIKE1 & 9 :I* ! PRES5CE ( A P>TY TO ! PROCE$+S IS IMPLICIT3 ,! SUBJECT TO BE DEF5D$4 ,! APPO9TM5T ( A LAWY] IS ! REJECTION ( CLAIM$ ACTIONS ( ATTACK4 ,! RELATION ) ! REF]5CE L9K IS ! ANALOGY ) TRIALS ( ! PA/ SU* AS ! ,O,R,A,I ONE1 ! ',C]VANTES' CASE & ! ',BOMBAS' CASE4 ,!SE TRIALS ALL HAD A SY/EMATIC & ME?ODICAL ORGANIZATION *>T 7IT MU/ BE PO9T$ \T1 H[EV]1 ?AT SOME COMRADES 9VOLV$ 9 ! 9VE/IGATION ( 9FAM\S ,M>9I REVOK$ !IR LEGAL DEF5SE & CLAIM$ TO BELONG TO A SPECIFIC GR\P7 ?R\< ACTS ( COMPLETION ( A T]M9OLOGY COMP5DIUM 9 ASSUM$ COMPLETION ( ! DEF5SE4 ,DUR+ A TRIAL1 ! EFFECTIV5ESS ( ! CONCEPT ( DEF5SE BECOMES A DYNAMIC ROLE ?AT P>TICIPATES TO ! DIALECTICS ) ! 9FAM\S PUBLIC PROSECUTOR4 ,! TWI/$ & COMPLEX RI CORE ( ! ASSUMPTION ( ! LAW IS A CONT9U\S P5ETRATION ( ! ATTRIBUTION ( A CONCEPT 9TR9SIC TO ! ASSUMPTION ( AN EXPLICITLY P5ETRAT$ 'QUALITY' ( ! 'DEF5DANT'3 ,! *>ACT]IZATION ( ! DEF5DANT 9 EQUALIZATION ( ! ESS5CE-NUCLEUS ( ! 'LAW'4 ,! APOLOGETIC & COMPLEX P5AL LAW - ( CON/ITUTIONAL & JURIDICAL NORMS - IS ! TRADITIONAL CONCEPTION ( BEHAVIOR ACCORD+ TO ! RULES ( HUMAN FUNCTION+4 ,COMMON S5SE GIVES AN OBLIGATION-NORM W$G$ 9 AN 9DIVIDUAL TO ! OBJECTIVITY ( ! LAW4 ,! OBJECT ( ! LAW IS COMP5SATION & P5ETRATION ( ! OBJECTIVITY ( ! SUBJECT ADJU/$ TO ! OBLIGATION-NORM4 ,! LOGIC NORM-MODEL RUNS 9 AN ID5TICAL ID5TIFICATION ( ! EFFECTIVE F\NDATION ( ! COMPLEXITY ( ! MODEL-PRAXIS SO ?AT :5 ONE TRIES TO 'GET \T' ( A METAPHORICAL LABYR9? ONE GETS 9TO IT4 ,! SY/EM ( PR9CIPLES & PRECEPTS - ) ! ,DEMIURGE DELIV]+ ! KEY ?AT OP5S & CLOSES OR CLOSES BY OP5+8 ,! MODEL PRAXIS ( ! LAW IS ! CON=MATION *A9+ ! BEHAVIOR ( ! AFFILIATES 7H[ CAN ONE DI/+UI% ! 9DIVIDUAL :O TRIES TO BREAK ! LAW :ILE BE+ 9SIDE IT BY RI*Y & ITS BELIEV]S GO 9TO ! LAW & JUDICIAL ?\E ! EXCULPATORY & S*EMATIC PIVOT ( ! JURIDICAL AN>*I/ AS CONC]NS TAK+ A /ANCE 7H]E ,I'M US+ A DESCRIPTIVE =MULA SUITABLE TO ! S5T5CE WRITT5 ABOVE7 9 CRIM9AL TRIALS4 ,! =MAL CONCEPT CONSEQU5T TO ! JURIDICAL ACTION IS ! COMPLETION 9 A SOCIETY-/RUCTURE ( ! BEHAVIOR ( ! AFFILIATES 9 AN OBJECTIVE F\NDATION 9 ! RETRIBUTION ( ! SANCTION4 ',! ORD] ( EV5TS IS TO DIRECT ! TRANSLATION ( AN 9CL9$ D$UCTION TO A REV]SIBILITY BETWE5 ,ABNEGATION & ,9VOCATION4' ,! REPRODUCIBILITY ( AN ASS]T+ EV5T 9 A CON=MI/ LANGUAGE ?AT CAN BE TRANSF]R$ TO ADULATION ( ! C\RT IS A FALSE DOCTR9E ( D$ICATION - DISPOS$ 9 ! ASS]T+ & BELONG+ DECLAMATORY M9DSET ( ! LAWY]4 ,! GNOMIC =M ( ! HOLY *UR* ( R$EMPTIVE AN>*Y REJECTS ANY DISSONANT IMPULSE - & FOLL[S ! PRECEPTS ( DEFUNCT ,MALATE/A & HIS PURPOSES ( AN AN>*I/ SOCIETY ) M5TAL HOSPITALS = ! ANTISOCIAL3 SO ! RI*I/ - NORM-NORMALIZ$ 9 FRONT ( ! DISSOLUTION ( ALL JURIDICAL LIMITS3 ,BY GIV+ A LIMIT 9 A RE/RA9T GIV5 TO ! VALUE ( 'ACT+'4 ,! ,ANTI-JURIDICAL & ,AMORAL ACTION ANNIHILATES 9 ONE 9/ANT - 9 ! /REET AS WELL AS 9 POLICE /ATIONS & PRISONS - ! USE ( ! LAW1 & 9 ?IS ! JURIDICAL AN>*I/ IS FAC$ ) AN 9SIDI\S 5EMY1 :O ACTS FOLL[+ HIS EGOI/ & ANTI-JURIDICAL IMPULSES & EXP&S HIS =CE ( IMPACT AGA9/ ! COMMUNITY-ORD] 9 :I* /&S ! RI*I/ R$EMPTIVE ( HIS ACTIONS4 ,! R$EMPTIVE-JUDICIAL AN>*I/ R5\NCES HIS 9DIVIDUALITY & ]ECTS A NEW ORD] \T ( ! REGULATION & PRECEPTS ( ! CU/OM ( ! LAW4 ,DOES ACTION ASSUME ! CONSULTATION ( ! MOTION C>RY+ ! ACTION8 ,! LIMIT GIV5 TO ! ATTRIBUTION ( ! 'GIV+' IS ! L9K CONNECT+ TO AN 9HIBITORY PROCESS ( ASSIMILATION ( =MAL E?ICAL-DEMOCRATIC-C5TRI/ P[]3 ,! PR(ILE ( ! CON=MATION & CONV5TIONAL /RUCTURE ?AT CONFIGURES ! 9T]F]5CE ( AN ORD] EXPOS$ 9 A =MULA ( ASSONANCE ) SOCIETY-ORD]4 ',DO+' BECOMES A MOD]ATE & BALANC$ 7OR BALANC]71 ME?ODICAL S*EME 9 EXCULPATORY PRECEPTS = ! USE ( ! LAW4 ,! ,NIHILI/ & HIS ,EGOI/ ,P[] EXALT ANY P>TICLE ( S+UL>ITY & D5Y ANY RI* ( MAXIMUM SATISFACTION4 ,! RESE>* EXP]IM5T$ ) 9 ?IS WAY IS TO BE F\ND EV]Y TIME 9 FRONT ( ! LIMIT ( A RICTATION ( ! ABILITY ( EXPRESSION ) T]MS BELONG+ TO ! LAW - 9 BO? APPO9T+ OR REVOK+ A LAWY] - ?IS LIMITS ! NEGATION ( ?IS ACQUISITION4 ,LIKE HAV+ RIRE/$3 9 A CONT9U\S 5TANGL+ ON ! ?RE%OLD ( ! METAPHORICAL LABYR9?1 Y\ HAVE ! RIE A 'DEF5DANT' Y\ HAVE ! RIRY ON ) ! RULES & PROC$URES ( DAILY LIFE4 ,! ACT ( JURISPRUD5TIAL DOCTR9E IS ! CONC5TRATION ( ! LAW EXPRESS$ 9 =MULAS CORRESPOND+ TO ! DUTY IMPRESS$ ?R\< CODES-ORD]S SUITABLE TO ! RIT CODIFI$ 9 A ROLE DECID$ = ANY 9DIVIDUAL SUBJECT$ TO SOCIETY4 ,!RE=E ONE 5T]S A METAPHORICAL LABYR9? - BECAUSE ! RIY COMPLEX ?AT P]MEATES ! OBJECTIFICATION ( ! KEY ?AT OP5S & CLOSES & ?AT CLOSES BY OP5+4 ,! KEY IS ! LABYR9?-METAPHOR ON :I* ?RE%OLD ONE '/&S' BECAUSE ! QUALITY ( ! ASSUMPTION ( BE+ DEF5DANT IS NOT OPTIONAL BUT SUBJECT$ TO ! CODIFICATION REGI/]$ 9 ! RI*I/ ?9KS IT IS POSSIBLE TO ATTACK AS HE LET HIMSELF BE DEF5D$ BY A LAWY]4 ,9 ! CONTEXT ( ,NIHILI/ EXP]IM5TATION1 H[ CAN ONE ANNIHILATE ASSOCIATION & CODES-ORD]S8 ,P5AL LAW IS BAS$ ON F\R FUNDAM5TAL PR9CIPLES COMPLY+ ) A PYRAMIDAL ORD] 7:I* WILL BE EXPLA9$ 9 ANO!R PIECE ( WRIT+71 SU* AS3 LEGALITY1 MAT]IALITY1 (F5SIV5ESS & GUILT4 ,IT PLACES ! SUBMITT$ 9DIVIDUAL )9 A S]IES ( PRECEPTS 9 :I* ! TRAJECTORY ( A METAPHORICAL LABYR9? IS EXPRESS$ ?R\< CONCEPTS CONSID]$ OBJECTIVE & :]E ! KEY - IMP5ETRABLE & P]MEAT+ - CLOSES BUT OP5S TO ! DUTY TO C>RY ON ) EV5TS PRODUC+ P5AL NORMS SUITABLE TO ! USE ( ! RIT ( ! RIE P>T ( BE+ AFFILIATES4 ,! ABOVE M5TION$ PR9CIPLES CONV]GE ?R\< ! '?RE%OLD' & EV5TUALLY GOT /UCK TO ! WALLS ( ! METAPHORICAL LABYR9?3 !Y (F] PROBABLE & POSSIBLE *OICES ( R$EMPTION :5 ASSUM+ ! ROLE SUITABLE ) SOCIETY BECAUSE ! EXPRESS+ QUALITY IS BY RIT TO A TRIAL & GO+ ?R\< ! METAPHORICAL LABYR9? 7LABYR9? BECOMES A JUDICIAL CITADEL3 ?OSE :O EXP]I5C$ ! 5TRANCE TO ONE ( !SE ,TEMPLES ( PROPHECY KN[ :AT ,I'M TALK+ AB\T74 ,ME%ES & B>B$ WIRE1 :I* ONE TRIES TO GET \T (1 >E ! 9/ABLE P]CEPTIVE ATTEMPT AT ! DI/ANCE BETWE5 ! R$EMPTIVE ROAD & SALVATION BEYOND NETS4 ,! ME%ES OP5S TO GLIMM]S1 :I* A GAZE ?9KS !Y CAN BE A POT5TIAL TO GET \T - BUT !Y >E ! DEP]SONALIZATION ?AT A GAZE '9T5DS' AS CELLS :]E ONE CAN ATONES = ONE'S S9S4 ,ONE GETS 9 & \T BY 5T]+ A 'CELL'1 & GETS \T ) ! KEY ?AT OP5S-BY CLOS+ BUT OP5S TO ! R$EMPTION & ! PASSIVITY ( AN OPTIONAL CODE ORD] COMPLY+ ) ! PR9CIPLES E/ABLI%$ BY SOCIETY & ITS AFFILIATES4 ,BY ASSIMILAT+ ITSELF TO ! HOMOLOGAT+ 'ALL' ( ! MASS1 ! HOLY *UR* ( R$EMPTIVE AN>*Y TRIES TO AFFIRM ITSELF S ADVOCATE ( DOM9ANT RULES - & C>RIES ON ) ITS RECUP]ATIVE ROLE 9 JUDICIAL MATT]S )\T ANY CRITIQUE4 ,REG>D+ OP]ATION ',>DIRE' - 9 SPITE ( ! FACT ?AT COMRADES 9VOLV$ 9 IT DEF9E !MSELVES & '9DIVIDUALI/S' - IT SEEMS ?AT ! LATT] WANT TO TAKE ON 9DIRECT COMPLICITY ) ! AN>*Y *UR* ( R$EMPTION4 ,?IS %\LD BE CLE> TO ?OSE :O AS DEF5DANTS HAVE EXPRESS$ !MSELVES 9 FAVOR ( A TE*NICAL DEF5SE1 & NULLIFY+ !IR PA/ PASSIONS HAVE MADE 9VALID ANY AMORAL DEBATE ON ! ANNIHILAT+ ATTACK ( ! 9DIVIDUAL1 & ATTACK AS AMORAL A-=M ?AT D5IES SOCIAL PEACE & /ABILIZATION ( PEACE1 & NEGATION ( UNIV]SAL VALUES1 CLAIMS1 EXP]I5CES ( BLOOD EXP]IM5T+ ) 9DIVIDUAL & EGOI/ DEEP5+1 & LA/ BUT NOT LEA/ ! DECL>ATION MANY TIMES EXPRESS$ 3 ',LONG LIVE ! BLACK ,9T]NATIONAL6' ,! GU>ANTEE+ FUNCTION ( P5AL PR9CIPLES CONSI/S 9 ! SUBJECT$ USE 7ONE IS NEV] REALLY SUBJECTIVE :5 ONE USES A RITICULAT$ 9 PR9CIPLES ( /ABILITY AIM+ AT ! COMMON GOOD ( ! AFFILIATES4 ,SO1 H[ CAN ONE CLAIM AN ACT AGA9/ SO CALL$ =MAL 'P[]' 7H]E IT EM]GES - ?R\< ! PRECEPTS ( ! R$EMPTIVE *UR* ( AN>*Y - ?AT ,EGOI/ EXT5D$ P[] ( ! 9DIVIDUAL DOESN'T EXI/78 ,DOES ! ACT ( CLAIM+ ONESELF 9 C\RT - OR DO+ IT BY NOT GO+ - BECOME AGA9 AN ACQUIR$ RID >E AN EXP]IM5T ON H[ ONE CAN ANNIHILATE ! USE ( ! LAW 9 AN ATTACK ON ! /RUCTURES & SUP]/RUCTURES ( HUMAN SOCIETY4 ,! COMPLEXITY PRODUC+ SUBJECTION TO ! LAW 9 BE+ P>T ( HUMAN ASSOCIATION PLACES DE/RUCTION 9 A CONT9U\S GO+ ?R\< DAILY LIFE - 9 ! FRAGM5TATION ( ALL P5AL CODES & SUBJECTIVE PACIFICATION - 9 ORD] TO RECOGNIZE ! OBJECTIVITY 9TR9SIC TO A COMPLEX P]MEAT+ ! CODES-ORD]S4 ,9 ! COMPLEM5T>Y RESIDUE ( ! LAW & SOCIETY-ORD]1 EV5 9 A 'SURPLUS' !RE >E ! BASES TO BE 9TEGRAT$ 9 EQUAL WAY TO ! RULES ( ! AFFILIATES - 9 ANY GO+ BACKW>DS :]E ! EXPRESSIVE & COMPLET+ MODULATION 9 RECONSID]+ ! 'ATTEMPT' AT GO+ BACK IS REPEAT$4 ,ONE GOES 9 & \T & GOES BACK 9 ALL ASPECTS CONSEQU5TIAL TO LIFE 9 ASSOCIATION 9 ACT+ ?R\< SUB-*A9+ RI FROM ! PAV$ ROADS ( ! C\NTRYSIDE & ! /REETS ( ! CAPITAL4 ,WE'LL MAKE !M DISAPPE> FROM ! T[NS4 ,REMEMB]3 :5 ?IS HAPP5S ?OSE :O >E NOT ) US WILL BE AGA9/ US1 \R 5EMY4 ,& WE'LL USE ANY MEANS TO EXT]M9ATE ! 5EMY4' ',TILL ! 5D'1 ,DAMIANO ,BOLANO 7,S\RCE3 ,RETRIEV$ ON ,SEPTEMB] #a#c1 #bab FROM ACT=FREE4NO/ATE4NET47 ,FROM 3 ,!,AN>*I/,LIBR>Y4ORG4 ,*RONOLOGY 3 ,JANU>Y #i1 #bbb 3 ,! ,CODE ( ! ,KEY-,ORD] -- ,ADD$4 FILE G5]AT$ FROM 3 HTTP3_/_/REVOLTLIB4COM_/