,! ,9COH]5CE & ,UNSURVIVABILITY ( ,NON-,AN>*I/ ,TRAN%UMANISM ,PEOPLE 3 ,AU?OR 3 ,WILLIAM ,GILLIS ,TEXT 3 7?IS WAS DELIV]$ AS A SPEE* ON ,OCTOB] #a#h1 #b#a#e1 9 ,OAKL&1 ,CALI=NIA1 AT ! 0,FUTURE ( ,POLITICS0 CONF]5CE CO-SPONSOR$ BY ,I,E,E,T7 ,! MORE MEANS BY :I* PEOPLE CAN ACT ! EASI] ATTACK BECOMES & ! H>D] DEF5SE BECOMES4 ,IT'S A SIMPLE MATT] ( COMPLEXITY4 ,! ATTACK] ONLY NE$S TO *OOSE ONE L9E ( ATTACK1 ! DEF5D] NE$S TO SECURE AGA9/ ALL ( !M4 ,?IS ISN'T JU/ TRUE ( SMALL !RMAL EXHAU/ PORTS1 IT'S TRUE 9 \R S(TW>E ECOSY/EMS TODAY & ANY O!R SY/EM ) MANY DIM5SIONS ( MOVEM5T4 ,COMPLEXITY1 MORE DEGREES ( FRE$OM )9 A SY/EM1 ALL[ = GREAT] ATTACK SURFACE4 ,:5 !Y CAN COME NOT JU/ FROM ALL PO9TS ON ! COMPASS BUT FROM ABOVE & BEL[ AS WELL4 ,! >C ( HUMAN HI/ORY IS AN >C B5T BY \R CREATIVITY & 9QUIRY T[>DS MORE OPTIONS1 MORE WAYS ( EXI/+ & ACT+4 ,T[>DS GREAT] FRE$OM4 ,EV]Y HUMAN 9V5TION EXP&S 9 ! IMM$IATE ! NUMB] ( MEANS WE HAVE TO ACT4 ,& 9T]TW9$ ) SU* FRE$OM HAS ( C\RSE COME GREAT] DE/RUCTIVE CAPACITY4 ,FROM ! EON :5 ONLY AN ELITE C\LD BE W>RIORS1 :5 ATTACK WAS ! PURVIEW ( A SELECT FEW1 TO AN ]A :5 ANYBODY C\LD C>RY A SPE> OR SWORD & KILL MAYBE ONE O!R P]SON BE=E DY+1 TO ! ]A ( ! MUSKET & ! AUTOMATIC WEAPON4 ,TODAY EA* & EV]Y ONE ( US C>RIES SMALL GR5ADES >\ND 9 \R POCKETS & BAGS4 ,AN 9CID5TAL BYPRODUCT ( /OR+ *>GE = \R PHONES & LAPTOPS4 ,TOMORR[ ! HOBBYI/ ) AN ,R,N,A PR9T] 9 H] G>AGE 9 ,SEATTLE WILL BE ABLE TO D[NLOAD OR TWEAK TOGE!R AN ,EBOLA,S,>,SDEA?POX ( SU* APOCALYPTIC VIRUL5CE ?AT IT W\LD NEV] EVOLVE NATURALLY4 ,?IS IS NOT A DANG] POS$ BY A S+LE TE*NOLOGY1 IT IS 9H]5T TO ! V]Y >C ( TE*NOLOGICAL DEVELOPM5T ITSELF4 ,AS \R TOOLS EXP& \R PHYSICAL FRE$OM !Y =CE *ANGES TO \R SOCIAL FRE$OM4 ,AS WE'VE PROGRESS$ ?R\< \R ACCEL]AT+ TE*NOLOGICAL DEVELOPM5T -- AS ! KN[L$GE WE DISCOV] & ! TOOLS WE 9V5T HAVE 9EXORABLY EXP&$ \R CAPACITY = ATTACK -- \R SOCIAL SY/EMS HAVE EVOLV$ TOO4 ,!Y HAVE HAD TO4 ,FROM HONOR SY/EMS TO DEAL ) A FEW GREAT W>RIORS TO E>LY MAJORIT>IAN DEMOCRACIES :]E C\NT+ HEADS WAS R\IES TO BREAK FROM ! ,BRITI% ,EMPIRE1 TO /ICKS ( 0DYNAMITE0 -- ! GREAT LEVEL]1 AS IT BECAME KN[N TO ! WORK+ CLASS 9 ! /RUGGLES ( ! PROGRESSIVE ]A4 ,\R SOCIAL SY/EMS1 \R POLITICAL 9/ITUTIONS1 \R CIVIC MORALS1 HAVE GRUDG+LY ADAPT$ TO ?IS *ANG+ CONTEXT4 ,BUT !Y HAVE NOT ADAPT$ FA/ 5\<4 ,:5 WE TALK AB\T ! /UNN+ ADVANCEM5TS & *ANGES ?AT HAVE BE5 UNLEA%$ BY ! FE$BACK+ EFFECTS ( TE*NOLOGICAL DEVELOPM5T !RE'S AN UND]/&ABLE DESP]ATION 9 \R LANGUAGE4 ,GUYS GUYS GUYS ?IS IS SO IMPORTANT4 ,?IS IS GO+ TO BE A ?+4 ,!RE >E RISKS TO ?IS4 ,WE'D BETT] DO IT RIE RECONCILABLE IS ABSURD4 ,DEMOCRACY 9 ! S5SE ( MAJORIT>IAN DECISION MAK+ IS PRIMEVAL4 ,IT /EMS FROM A CONTEXT :]E 'H[ MANY PEOPLE' Y\ HAD DET]M9$ A BATTLE4 ,BUT EV5 CON/ITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY1 M9>*ISM1 5LI ?AT CAN ONLY BE WON BY TOTALLY DE/ROY+ ALMO/ EV]Y MEAN+FUL ASPECT ( \R TE*NOLOGIES4 ,DAVID ,CAM]ON1 ,JEB ,BU% & NUM]\S O!R POLITICIANS1 GOV]NM5T FUNCTION>IES & *IEFS ( POLICE 9 ! SUPPOS$LY 5LIR[$ SO DRAMATICALLY ?AT WE CAN'T EV5 FA?OM O!R WAYS TO COLLABORATE OR RESOLVE CONFLICTS4 ,! 9T]NET C\LD V]Y EASILY BECOME A :ITELI/$ AFFAIR1 :]E EV]Y PACKET IS SIGN$ BY GOV]NM5T CONTROLL$ S]V] 9FRA/RUCTURE1 PO9T TO PO9T TO PO9T4 ,DEVICES C\LD BE BACK-DOOR$ FROM FACTORY TO CONSUM]4 ,NO PRODUCTION ALL[$ \TSIDE ! /ATE'S VIEW4 ,WE >E NOT YET AT ! PO9T :]E FABRICATION IS DI/RIBUT$ 5\< TO MAKE SUPPRESSION OR DRACONIAN REGULATION IMPOSSIBLE4 ,! ABOLITION ( G5]AL PURPOSE COMPUT+ IS A REAL ?REAT4 ,AS >E CALLS = ! ABOLITION ( ! 9T]NET4 ,:5 IT COMES TO ! 9T]NET1 TO 9=MATION TE*NOLOGIES1 TO ! DISSOLUTION ( 9TELLECTUAL PROP]TY1 WE (T5 SAY ?AT ! MA? IS ON ! SIDE ( FRE$OM4 ,BUT :ILE IT (T5 MAKES AU?ORIT>IAN CONTROL SOME:AT MORE *ALL5G+ ?OSE *ALL5GES CAN /ILL BE OV]COME ) SUFFICI5T =CE1 ) SUFFICI5T 9FRA/RUCTURAL RIGIDITY1 & ) SUFFICI5T PUBLIC SUPPORT4 ,! MO/ VIRUL5T =CE 9 ! CRYPTO W>S1 9 ! COPYRIS1 & EV]Y O!R BATTLE OV] TE*NOLOGY 9 ! LA/ ?REE DECADES HAS BE5 N>RATIVE4 ,WE >E ON MANY FRONTS1 9 MANY DEMOGRAPHICS1 LOS+ ?AT BATTLE4 ,! >I/OCRACY HAS HI/ORICALLY BE5 ANTI-TE*4 ,& MU* ( ! MID TW5TIE? C5TURY EXPLOSION ( CONT95TAL PHILOSOPH]S WRIT+ NEBUL\S OBSCURANTI/ SCRE$S AGA9/ TE*NOLOGY & SCI5CE W]E FROM A TRADITION ?AT KNEW P]FECTLY WELL ?AT !Y HAD TO DECREASE ! TE*NOLOGICAL MEANS PEOPLE HAD ACCESS TO 9 ORD] TO /AY RELEVANT4 ,!Y CRAFT$ ,ORWELLIAN VISIONS ( 0FRE$OM0 ?AT W]E AB\T RETREAT+ TO SOME K9D ( CONF9$ & PROTECT$ /ATIC /ATE ( LIFE4 ,!IR REJECTION ( TE*NOLOGY AM\NT$ TO A REJECTION ( POSITIVE FRE$OM1 ! FRE$OM TO4 ,:AT !Y 5C\RAG$ 9/EAD WAS3 ,FRE$OM FROM KN[L$GE1 FRE$OM FROM *OICE1 FRE$OM FROM GR[?1 FRE$OM FROM CREATIVITY & 9QUIRY4 ,?IS REACTION>Y CURR5T SEEPS ?R\<\T \R SOCIETY4 ,IT IS IMM5SELY 9FLU5TIAL4 ,IT'S NOT TO BE UND]E/IMAT$4 ,FRE$OM-TO IS DISRUPTIVE & COMPLEX4 ,IT EXP&S OPTIONS4 ,& :5 TRULY DEC5TRALIZ$ -- SPREAD TO 9DIVIDUALS -- IT MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE = P[] TO FUNCTION4 ,= ANY ACTOR1 9DIVIDUAL OR 9/ITUTION1 TO CONTROL ! VA/ UNFA?OMABLE DIV]SITY & COMPLEXITY ( ! WORLD4 ,IMPOSSIBLE TO IMPOSE $ICTS1 EV5 0DEMOCRATIC0 ONES4 ,:5 LIB]AL OR SOCIAL DEMOCRAT TRAN%UMANI/S DECL>E ?AT :AT WE NE$ IS TE*NOLOGY 0UND] ! CONTROL ( ,! ,PEOPLE01 :AT IS NEV] 9CLUD$ 9 ?AT IS H[ EXACTLY ?AT K9D ( CONTROL IS SUPPOS$ TO WORK4 ,:AT DOES A WORLD LOOK LIKE 9 :I* WE HAVE ! CAPACITY TO /OP PEOPLE FROM PR9T+ ,>-#a#eS8 ,=GET ! FUZZY-WUZZY ASSOCIATIONS ( 0DEMOCRACY01 EV5 0DIRECT DEMOCRACY04 ,ASK Y\RSELF :AT ACTUALLY NE$S TO BE DONE TO CONTROL G5E !RAPY8 ,S+LE FACILITIES ( GOV]NM5T OV]SE5 USE ( HI< TE*NOLOGIES8 ,MASSIVE BACKDOORS 9 EV]YONE'S DEVICES ?AT AGGRESSIVELY MONITOR & LIMIT USE8 ,TOTALIT>IAN CONTROL ( EV]Y COMMUNICATION ON ! PLANET8 ,AGGRESSIVE RAIDS AGA9/ ALL HACK]S & T9K]]S8 ,SY/EMATIC ACC\NT+ ( EV]Y FABRICATION MA*9]Y 9 EXI/5CE8 ,CON/ANT SURVEILLANCE ( ANYONE ) KN[L$GE ( H[ !SE ?+S WORK8 ,COMPLETE CONTROL ( ALL RES\RCE ALLOCATION ON ! PLANET8 ,?IS IS ! ,O,N,L,Y \TCOME = ! LOGIC ( 0SOCIAL DEMOCRACY0 :5 APPLI$ TO TRAN%UMAN ASPIRATIONS4 ,WE CANNOT CONTROL ADVANC$ TE*NOLOGY )\T AN AU?ORIT>IANISM SO COMPLETE IT W\LD MAKE ,HITL] & ,/AL9 SALIVATE 9 !IR GRAVES4 ,SO :AT CAN WE DO8 ,AT A PRIOR CONF]5CE H]E !RE WAS A TALK ON ! SUP]H]O N>RATIVE & ,I BR\ITY ( EMPA?Y ?AT CL>IFIES & REF9ES \R VALUES40 ,ABSOLUTELY4 ,:AT DOES ?AT LOOK LIKE8 ,H[ DO Y\ GET !RE8 ,& :AT >E ! ME*ANISMS BY :I* SU* A WORLD CAN FUNCTION8 ,H[ >E DISAGREEM5TS SETTL$8 ,?ANKFULLY WE DON'T NE$ TO RE9V5T ! :EEL4 ,!RE'S A LONG/&+ MOVEM5T ?AT HAS BE5 TACKL+ !SE SOCIAL & E?ICAL ISSUES1 & DEVELOP+ ANSW]S & ANALYSIS 9 DEP? = ! LA/ TWO C5TURIES4 0,AN>*ISM0 AS A T]M WAS LAUN*$ BY ! ,FR5* J\RNALI/ ,PI]RE-,JOSEPH ,PR\DHON -- A WILDLY POPUL> REPORT] & COLUMNI/ COMP>ABLE TO \R ,GL5N ,GRE5WALD TODAY4 ,IT WAS ADOPT$ AS A WAY ( HIT ! ,ORWELLIAN USE ( 0AN>*Y0 TO SIGNIFY BO? MAXIMAL FRE$OM -- ! ABS5CE ( RUL]%IP OR ( P[] RELATIONS -- ,& TO ALSO SIMULTANE\SLY MEAN *AOTIC VIOL5CE1 ! PRES5CES ( COMPET+ W\LD-BE RUL]S & FRACTI\S P[] RELATIONS4 ,?IS D\BLE USE 9 :I* ! T]M 0)\T RUL]%IP0 OR 0AN>*IA0 IS US$ TO 9/EAD SIGNIFY COMPET+ OR FRACTUR$ P[] RELATIONS HAS HI/ORICALLY BE5 US$ TO %UT D[N ANY & ALL MOVEM5TS FOCUS$ ON LIB]TY1 MO/ FAM\SLY AGA9/ ! PEASANTS 9 ! ,5GLI% ,CIVIL W>4 ,Y\ WANT FRE$OM8 ,WE ALL KN[ ?AT FRE$OM IS *AOTIC VIOL5T OPPRESSION4 ,9 ?IS DEF9ITION AS PROMOT$ BY ! ELITES ( ! MIDDLE AGES ! V]Y IDEA ( ,N,O,T CONTROLL+ EA* O!R1 NOT DOM9E]+ EA* O!R1 NOT EXPLOIT+1 ?IEV+1 OR DO+ VIOL5CE TO EA* O!R1 IS WRITT5 \T ( \R LANGUAGE ITSELF4 ,IT IS MADE IMPOSSIBLE 9 SOME REAL S5SE TO EV5 ?9K4 ,PR\DHON ATTACK$ ?AT BY RETURN+ ! T]M TO ITS ETYMOLOGICAL ROOTS & ?IS SET (F TWO C5TURIES ( CONSI/5T DILIG5T RESI/ANCE TO P[]4 ,AN>*I/S HAVE NEV] TAK5 P[]1 WE HAVE RESI/$ AU?ORIT>IANISM & OPPRESSION 9 EV]Y >5A4 ,FROM CALL+ \T ,M>XISM LONG BE=E ITS DRACONIAN ASPIRATIONS BECAME PUBLIC RECORD1 TO FIONS1 ! CZ>S1 ! OLIG>*S1 & ! SOVIET BUREAUCRATS4 ,& WE'VE BE5 EXTRAORD9>ILY POPUL> 9 DIFF]5T REGIONS AT DIFF]5T PO9TS 9 HI/ORY1 AL?\< WE HAVE NOT YET HAD SUFFICI5T CRITICAL MASS TO COMPLETELY TRANS=M ! WORLD4 ,9 EV]Y 9/ANCE :]E AN>*ISM SURG$ TO LOCALIZ$ POPUL>ITY ) A FEW MILLION ADH]5TS1 AS 9 ,SPA9 BUT ALSO ,UKRA9E & ,MAN*URIA1 EV]Y SURR\ND+ P[] IMM$IATELY PUT !IR W>S ON HOLD TO COLLABORATE 9 SNUFF+ \T ! EXAMPLES WE PROVID$ ( A BETT] WORLD1 ( BETT] WAYS ( 9T]ACT+ & SETTL+ DISPUTES ) ONE ANO!R1 ?AT DO NOT TURN TO CONTROL BUT BUILD A TOL]ABLE CONS5SUS = ALL P>TIES :5 AGREEM5T IS NE$$4 ,WE'VE BE5 AT ! =EFRONT NOT JU/ ( TE*NOLOGY LIKE CRYPTOCURR5CIES & ! TOR PROJECT1 BUT WE'VE ALSO BE5 AT ! =EFRONT ( /RUGGLES AGA9/ PATRI>*Y1 RACISM1 HOMOPHOBIA1 AGEISM1 ABLEISM1 ETC1 ETC4 ,S9CE LONG BE=E !RE W]E POPUL> COALITIONS LIKE 0FEM9ISM04 ,WE SMUGGL$ GUNS TO SLAVES & RAN ABOLITIONI/ J\RNALS4 ,WE'VE C\RS$ ?R\< ! VE9S ( \R EXI/+ SOCIETY1 PIONE]+ MYRIAD SOCIAL TE*NOLOGIES LIKE CR$IT UNIONS & COOP]ATIVES4 ,WE'VE CONSI/5TLY S]V$ AS ! RADICAL $GE ( ! WORLD'S CONSCI5CE1 & PLAY$ A CRITICAL ROLE 9 EXP&+ :AT IS POSSIBLE :ILE DEVELOP+ & FIELD TE/+ NEW 9SI*ISM -- AS MANY COMM5TATORS HAVE WRYLY NOT$ -- HAS S]V$ AS ! LABORATORY ( ! LEFT1 ( SOCIAL JU/ICE & RESI/ANCE MOVEM5TS >\ND ! WORLD4 ,EV5 :]E WE REMA9 M>G9AL1 ! TOOLS WE 9V5T EV5TUALLY BECOME MA9/REAM4 ,Y\ DO NOT NE$ TO WOND] H[ PEOPLE W\LD RESOLVE CONFLICTS IF EV]Y SUP]-EMP[]$ 9DIVIDUAL WAS C>RY+ ! EQUIVAL5T ( A NUCLE> VETO 9 !IR POCKET4 ,WE'VE BE5 TE/+ & DEVELOP+ SOCIAL =MS1 ADVANC$ GAME !ORETIC /RATEGIES ?AT TREAT PEOPLE ?AT WAY = E?ICAL REASONS ALONE4 ,WE ALREADY REPRES5T ! E?ICAL FRAMEWORK MO/ AT HOME 9 NAVIGAT+ A TRAN%UMAN WORLD ( 9DIVIDUAL SUP]EMP[]M5T4 ,= ALL \R O/5SIBLE M>G9ALIZATION TO ! JUNGLES ( ,*IAPAS OR ! /REETS ( ,A!NS1 WE'VE BE5 PREEMPTIVELY *URN+ \T ! POLITICS ( ! FUTURE = ! LA/ TWO C5TURIES4 ,BUT :AT ?IS EXP]I5CE HAS ALSO BR\*ISM BR+S A /EELY-EY$ CL>ITY TO ! L&SCAPE ON :I* WE /RUGGLE4 ,IT SAYS ?AT :ILE /ATE P[] CAN SOMETIMES SECURE SOME *ANGES1 ! MORE Y\ USE IT ! H>D] IT WILL BE TO DISSOLVE ?AT P[] ITSELF4 ,M>XI/S PRET5D$ AS ?\< !IR 5D GOAL WAS A CLASSLESS1 /ATELESS UTOPIA ( MAXIMAL FRE$OM1 BUT ! MEANS !Y *OSE W]E 9COH]5T ) ?IS GOAL4 ,Y\ CAN'T GULAG PEOPLE 9TO BE+ FREE4 ,& Y\ CAN'T REGULATE ! TOOLS PEOPLE BUILD :ILE MA9TA9+ A COMMITM5T TO EXP&+ !IR OPTIONS 9 LIFE1 TO MAK+ US 0MORE ?AN HUMAN40 ,5DS & MEANS >E NOT PRECISELY #a3#a1 BUT !Y >E DEEPLY 9T]CONNECT$4 ,& IF AN>*ISM -- & \R TOOLBOX ( RESPECTFUL AUTONOMY & CONS5T -- IS ! ONLY SURVIVABLE1 ! ONLY FUNCTIONAL WAY ( H&L+ ! ULTRAVIOLET LIMIT ( EXP&$ TE*NOLOGICAL CAPACITY1 !N WE CANNOT AF=D TO MOVE 9 OPPOS+ DIRECTIONS TODAY4 ,WE MU/ MOVE 9 WAYS ?AT DO NOT TRADE AWAY ! FUTURE = %ORT-SID1 T[>DS GREAT] /ATE P[]1 GREAT] P[] EV5 9 ! H&S ( CORPORATE GIANTS LIKE ,GOOGLE1 9 HOPES ?AT !SE MON/]S WE FE$ TO MAKE \R TASKS EASI] TODAY WILL SOMEH[ 0WI!R AWAY0 ON !IR [N ACCORD4 ,SOMEH[ COMPLY MEEKLY AS TE*NOLOGY IMP$ES & RESI/S ! P[] !Y'VE GR[N ACCU/OM$ TO4 ,WE MU/ TAKE ! SEEM+LY MORE DIFFICULT PA? =W>D1 BUT ONE ?AT REMA9S CONSI/5T4 ,BUT ?ANKFULLY ONE ( ! O!R ?+S AN>*ISM MAKES CLE> IS ?AT WE DO NOT HAVE TO RAISE HUGE LEGIONS ( PEOPLE TO \R SIDE TO W94 ,A T9Y T9Y M9ORITY CAN MAKE A HUGE DIFF]5CE1 CAN MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE = CONTROL TO FUNCTION -- CAN DISRUPT ! RIGIDITY & OV]EXT5SION 9H]5T TO SY/EMS ?AT ATTEMPT TO CONTROL US4 ,:5 ,I WAS ?IRTE5 ,I PUT ON A RA9COAT & TRUCK$ UP ! PACIFIC COA/ TO /REETS ( ,SEATTLE ! LA/ WEEK5D 9 ,NOVEMB]1 #a#i#i#i4 ,?AT DAY HAS S9CE BECOME 9FAM\S4 ,\R 0VICTORY0 OV] ! ,W,T,O M9I/]IAL HAS BECOME MY?OLOGIZ$ TO A DANG]\S DEGREE1 BUT IT'S WOR? CONVEY+ ! DESP]ATION WE FELT BE=EH&4 ,9 ! #iS AS IT GREW DRAMATICALLY 9 LEGAL & ECONOMIC /R5G? UNOPPOS$1 NO ONE KNEW ! ,W,T,O EV5 EXI/$4 ,! NEOLIB]AL VISION IT S]V$ WAS RIE 9H]5T TO ANY SY/EM ( CONTROL4 ,& !IR 9ABILITY TO MANAGE ! *URN+ *AOS ( Y\NG /UD5TS ON ! /REETS REFLECTS H[ COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY REMA9 ABSOLUTELY CRITICAL TO POLITICAL ISSUES4 ,! 9=MATION AGE HAS L$ TO 9CREAS+ COMPLEXITY ON MANY FRONTS ?R\< FE$BACK+ EFFECTS4 ,! SPE$ ?AT 9=MATION TE*NOLOGY PROVIDES TO \R MEMETIC & CULTURAL MUTATIONS HAS DRAMATICALLY 9CREAS$ ! COMPLEXITY ( ANY NUMB] ( ?+S4 ,TAKE HUMOR = EXAMPLE4 ,CONSID] :AT WAS FUNNY 9 ! #a#hS1 ! #a#i#eS1 ! #a#i#iS1 & :AT'S FUNNY TODAY4 ,HELL LET'S NOT =GET ?AT 9 ! #a#gS WE ?\RATIVES1 \R RELATION%IPS1 & \R POLITICS HAVE ONLY ACCEL]AT$4 ,& ) SU* COMPLEXITY COMES ! HOPE ( A R$UC$ CAPACITY = CONTROL4 ,IT BECOMES MU* H>D] = POLITICIANS OR ADV]TIZ]S TO SELL SIMPLE UNIV]SALLY POT5T N>RATIVES4 ,!Y ALREADY SEE 9CREAS+LY DIM9I%+ RETURNS & LESS5$ TRACTION4 ,:AT ?IS PROCESS ( ACCEL]AT+ COMPLEXITY REPRES5TS IS A SOCIAL S+UL>ITY4 ,IF ! TE*NOLOGICAL S+UL>ITY IS ! PO9T PA/ :I* WE CAN'T MAKE PR$ICTIONS OR MA9TA9 CONTROL BECAUSE ! COMPLEXITY ( TE*NOLOGICAL DEVELOPM5TS EXCE$S \R GRASP !N ! SOCIAL S+UL>ITY IS SIMIL>LY ! PO9T PA/ :I* WE CAN'T MAKE PR$ICTIONS OR MA9TA9 CONTROL BECAUSE ! COMPLEXITY ( \R CULTURE1 IDEAS1 & RELATIONS WILL HAVE GR[N TOO RI*1 DIV]SE1 COMPLEX1 ORGANIC1 & META4 ,SURE WE MID TAKE(F 9 A DECADE OR MORE4 ,WE JU/ HAVE TO UNLEA% & BETT] NETWORK ! EXI/+ P[] ( \R M9DS4 ,AN>*ISM COMPRISES A RI* ECOSY/EM ( !ORETICAL WORK ?AT IT W\LD BE LAURAY ( DISECONOMIES ( SCALE SUPPRESS$ BY ! HI/ORICAL SUBSIDY ( VIOL5CE & ! T5D5CY ( FRE$ M>KETS T[>DS EGALIT>IAN 5DS1 ,I ADVISE READ+ ,KEV9 ,C>SON4 ,= POLYC5TRIC LEGAL SY/EMS1 ,DAVID ,FRI$MAN & ,ROB]T ,MURPHY4 ,WE ALSO HAVE A /UNN+LY BROAD & DEEP DISC\RSE ON ME?ODOLOGIES & /RATEGIES :5 IT COMES TO ! PA? OR PA?S =W>D4 ,PET] ,GELD]LOOS & ,DAVID ,GRAEB] HAVE F\ND SOME R5[N 9 ?IS REG>D4 ,BUT AT CORE AN>*ISM IS AN E?ICAL PHILOSOPHY ?AT SEEKS TO EXP& FRE$OM4 ,IT'S MO/ FAM\S COMMITM5TS >E POLITICAL -- ! ABOLITION ( ! /ATE1 ! ABOLITION ( C5TRALIZ$ CONC5TRATIONS ( CO]CIVE P[] -- BUT IT EXT5DS FUR!R TO1 = EXAMPLE1 CRITIQUES ( CONTROL 9 9T]P]SONAL RELATIONS AS WELL AS CRITIQUES ( IDEOLOGICAL RIGIDITY4 ,9 ?IS RESPECT TRAN%UMANISM REPRES5TS YET ANO!R >M ( AN>*ISM3 A FOCUS ON EXP&+ FRE$OM 9 PHYSICAL T]MS & A CRITIQUE ( TIMID RETREAT TO SOME /ULTIFY+ 0HUMAN NATURE40 ,FROM 3 ,!,AN>*I/,LIBR>Y4ORG4 ,*RONOLOGY 3 ,JANU>Y #b#a1 #bba 3 ,! ,9COH]5CE & ,UNSURVIVABILITY ( ,NON-,AN>*I/ ,TRAN%UMANISM -- ,ADD$4 ,JANU>Y #f1 #bbb 3 ,! ,9COH]5CE & ,UNSURVIVABILITY ( ,NON-,AN>*I/ ,TRAN%UMANISM -- ,UPDAT$4 FILE G5]AT$ FROM 3 HTTP3_/_/REVOLTLIB4COM_/