,*APT] #f ,ON ,9DUCTION #aiabaiab ,PEOPLE 3 ,AU?OR 3 ,B]TR& ,RUSSELL ,TEXT 3 ,*,A,P,T,] ,V,I ,O,N ,9,D,U,C,T,I,O,N ,9 ALMO/ ALL \R PREVI\S DISCUSSIONS WE HAVE BE5 CONC]N$ 9 ! ATTEMPT TO GET CLE> AS TO \R DATA 9 ! WAY ( KN[L$GE ( EXI/5CE4 ,:AT ?+S >E !RE 9 ! UNIV]SE :OSE EXI/5CE IS KN[N TO US [+ TO \R BE+ ACQUA9T$ ) !M8 ,SO F>1 \R ANSW] HAS BE5 ?AT WE >E ACQUA9T$ ) \R S5SE-DATA1 &1 PROBABLY1 ) \RSELVES4 ,!SE WE KN[ TO EXI/4 ,& PA/ S5SE-DATA :I* >E REMEMB]$ >E KN[N TO HAVE EXI/$ 9 ! PA/4 ,?IS KN[L$GE SUPPLIES \R DATA4 ,BUT IF WE >E TO BE ABLE TO DRAW 9F]5CES FROM !SE DATA -- IF WE >E TO KN[ ( ! EXI/5CE ( MATT]1 ( O!R PEOPLE1 ( ! PA/ BE=E \R 9DIVIDUAL MEMORY BEG9S1 OR ( ! FUTURE1 WE MU/ KN[ G5]AL PR9CIPLES ( SOME K9D BY MEANS ( :I* SU* 9F]5CES CAN BE DRAWN4 ,IT MU/ BE KN[N TO US ?AT ! EXI/5CE ( SOME ONE SORT ( ?+1 ,A1 IS A SIGN ( ! EXI/5CE ( SOME O!R SORT ( ?+1 ,B1 EI!R AT ! SAME TIME AS ,A OR AT SOME E>LI] OR LAT] TIME1 AS1 = EXAMPLE1 ?UND] IS A SIGN ( ! E>LI] EXI/5CE ( LIE ALL CONV9C$ ?AT ! SUN WILL RISE TOMORR[4 ,:Y8 ,IS ?IS BELIEF A M]E BL9D \TCOME ( PA/ EXP]I5CE1 OR CAN IT BE JU/IFI$ AS A REASONABLE BELIEF8 ,IT IS NOT F9D A TE/ BY :I* TO JUDGE :E!R A BELIEF ( ?IS K9D IS REASONABLE OR NOT1 BUT WE CAN AT LEA/ ASC]TA9 :AT SORT ( G5]AL BELIEFS W\LD SUFFICE1 IF TRUE1 TO JU/IFY ! JUDGM5T ?AT ! SUN WILL RISE TOMORR[1 & ! MANY O!R SIMIL> JUDGM5TS UPON :I* \R ACTIONS >E BAS$4 ,IT IS OBVI\S ?AT IF WE >E ASK$ :Y WE BELIEVE IT ! SUN WILL RISE TOMORR[1 WE %ALL NATURALLY ANSW]1 ',BECAUSE IT ALWAYS HAS RIS5 EV]Y DAY'4 ,WE HAVE A FIRM BELIEF ?AT IT WILL RISE 9 ! FUTURE1 BECAUSE IT HAS RIS5 9 ! PA/4 ,IF WE >E *ALL5G$ AS TO :Y WE BELIEVE ?AT IT WILL CONT9UE TO RISE AS H]ET(ORE1 WE MAY APPEAL TO ! LAWS ( MOTION3 ! E>?1 WE %ALL SAY1 IS A FREELY ROTAT+ BODY1 & SU* BODIES DO NOT CEASE TO ROTATE UNLESS SOME?+ 9T]F]ES FROM \TSIDE1 & !RE IS NO?+ \TSIDE TO 9T]F]E ) !E E>? BETWE5 N[ & TOMORR[4 ,( C\RSE IT MIE QUITE C]TA9 ?AT !RE IS NO?+ \TSIDE TO 9T]F]E1 BUT ?IS IS NOT ! 9T]E/+ D\BT4 ,! 9T]E/+ D\BT IS AS TO :E!R ! LAWS ( MOTION WILL REMA9 9 OP]ATION UNTIL TO-MORR[4 ,IF ?IS D\BT IS RAIS$1 WE F9D \RSELVES 9 ! SAME POSITION AS :5 ! D\BT AB\T ! SUNRISE WAS FIR/ RAIS$4 ,! ONLY REASON = BELIEV+ ?AT ! LAWS ( MOTION REMA9 9 OP]ATION IS ?AT !Y HAVE OP]AT$ HI!RTO1 SO F> AS \R KN[L$GE ( ! PA/ 5ABLES US TO JUDGE4 ,IT IS TRUE ?AT WE HAVE A GREAT] BODY ( EVID5CE FROM ! PA/ 9 FAVOR ( ! LAWS ( MOTION ?AN WE HAVE 9 FAVOR ( ! SUNRISE1 BECAUSE ! SUNRISE IS M]ELY A P>TICUL> CASE ( FULFILLM5T ( ! LAWS ( MOTION1 & !RE >E C\NTLESS O!R P>TICUL> CASES4 ,BUT ! REAL QUE/ION IS3 ,DO ANY NUMB] ( CASES ( A LAW BE+ FULFILL$ 9 ! PA/ AF=D EVID5CE ?AT IT WILL BE FULFILL$ 9 ! FUTURE8 ,IF NOT1 IT BECOMES PLA9 ?AT WE HAVE NO GR\ND :ATEV] = EXPECT+ ! SUN TO RISE TO-MORR[1 OR = EXPECT+ ! BREAD WE %ALL EAT AT \R NEXT MEAL NOT TO POISON US1 OR = ANY ( ! O!R SC>CELY CONSCI\S EXPECTATIONS ?AT CONTROL \R DAILY LIVES4 ,IT IS TO BE OBS]V$ ?AT ALL SU* EXPECTATIONS >E ONLY PROBABLE2 ?US WE HAVE NOT TO SEEK = A PRO( ?AT !Y MU/ BE FULFILL$1 BUT ONLY = SOME REASON 9 FAVOR ( ! VIEW ?AT !Y >E LIKELY TO BE FULFILL$4 ,N[ 9 DEAL+ ) ?IS QUE/ION WE MU/1 TO BEG9 )1 MAKE AN IMPORTANT DI/9CTION1 )\T :I* WE %\LD SOON BECOME 9VOLV$ 9 HOPELESS CONFUSIONS4 ,EXP]I5CE HAS %[N US ?AT1 HI!RTO1 ! FREQU5T REPETITION ( SOME UNI=M SUCCESSION OR COEXI/5CE HAS BE5 A CAUSE ( \R EXPECT+ ! SAME SUCCESSION OR COEXI/5CE ON ! NEXT OCCASION4 ,FOOD ?AT HAS A C]TA9 APPE>ANCE G5]ALLY HAS A C]TA9 TA/E1 & IT IS A SEV]E %OCK TO \R EXPECTATIONS :5 ! FAMILI> APPE>ANCE IS F\ND TO BE ASSOCIAT$ ) AN UNUSUAL TA/E4 ,?+S :I* WE SEE BECOME ASSOCIAT$1 BY HABIT1 ) C]TA9 TACTILE S5SATIONS :I* WE EXPECT IF WE T\* !M2 ONE ( ! HORRORS ( A E SO SURPRIS$ AS TO BE 9CR$UL\S :5 !Y F9D !IR NATIVE LANGUAGE NOT UND]/OOD4 ,& ?IS K9D ( ASSOCIATION IS NOT CONF9$ TO M52 9 ANIMALS ALSO IT IS V]Y /RONG4 ,A HORSE :I* HAS BE5 (T5 DRIV5 ALONG A C]TA9 ROAD RESI/S ! ATTEMPT TO DRIVE HIM 9 A DIFF]5T DIRECTION4 ,DOME/IC ANIMALS EXPECT FOOD :5 !Y SEE ! P]SON :O FE$S !M4 ,WE KN[ ?AT ALL !SE RA!R CRUDE EXPECTATIONS ( UNI=MITY >E LIABLE TO BE MISLEAD+4 ,! MAN :O HAS F$ ! *ICK5 EV]Y DAY ?R\<\T ITS LIFE AT LA/ WR+S ITS NECK 9/EAD1 %[+ ?AT MORE REF9$ VIEWS AS TO ! UNI=MITY ( NATURE W\LD HAVE BE5 USEFUL TO ! *ICK54 ,BUT 9 SPITE ( ! MISLEAD+NESS ( SU* EXPECTATIONS1 4 !Y NEV]!LESS EXI/4 ,! M]E FACT ?AT SOME?+ HAS HAPP5$ A C]TA9 NUMB] ( TIMES CAUSES ANIMALS & M5 TO EXPECT ?AT IT WILL HAPP5 AGA94 ,?US \R 9/9CTS C]TA9LY CAUSE US TO BELIEVE ! SUN WILL RISE TO-MORR[1 BUT WE MAY BE 9 NO BETT] A POSITION ?AN ! *ICK5 :I* UNEXPECT$LY HAS ITS NECK WRUNG4 ,WE HAVE !RE=E TO DI/+UI% ! FACT ?AT PA/ UNI=MITIES CAUSE EXPECTATIONS AS TO ! FUTURE1 FROM ! QUE/ION :E!R !RE IS ANY REASONABLE GR\ND = GIV+ WEIE NO EXCEPTIONS4 ,! CRUDE EXPECTATIONS :I* WE HAVE BE5 CONSID]+ >E ALL SUBJECT TO EXCEPTIONS1 & !RE=E LIABLE TO DISAPPO9T ?OSE :O 5T]TA9 !M4 ,BUT SCI5CE HABITUALLY ASSUMES1 AT LEA/ AS A WORK+ HYPO!SIS1 ?AT G5]AL RULES :I* HAVE EXCEPTIONS CAN BE REPLAC$ BY G5]AL RULES :I* HAVE NO EXCEPTIONS4 ',UNSUPPORT$ BODIES 9 AIR FALL' IS A G5]AL RULE TO :I* BALLOONS & AIRPLANES >E EXCEPTIONS4 ,BUT ! LAWS ( MOTION & ! LAW ( GRAVITATION1 :I* ACC\NT = ! FACT ?AT MO/ BODIES FALL1 ALSO ACC\NT = ! FACT ?AT BALLOONS & AIRPLANES CAN RISE2 ?US ! LAWS ( MOTION & ! LAW ( GRAVITATION >E NOT SUBJECT TO !SE EXCEPTIONS4 ,! BELIEF ?AT ! SUN WILL RISE TO-MORR[ MI? CAME SUDD5LY 9TO CONTACT ) A L>GE BODY :I* DE/ROY$ ITS ROTATION2 BUT ! LAWS ( MOTION & ! LAW ( GRAVITATION W\LD NOT BE 9FR+$ BY SU* AN EV5T4 ,! BUS9ESS ( SCI5CE IS TO F9D UNI=MITIES1 SU* AS ! LAWS ( MOTION & ! LAW ( GRAVITATION1 TO :I*1 SO F> AS \R EXP]I5CE EXT5DS1 !RE >E NO EXCEPTIONS4 ,9 ?IS SE>* SCI5CE HAS BE5 REM>KABLY SUCCESSFUL1 & IT MAY BE CONC$$ ?AT SU* UNI=MITIES HAVE HELD HI!RTO4 ,?IS BR+S US BACK TO ! QUE/ION3 ,HAVE WE ANY REASON1 ASSUM+ ?AT !Y HAVE ALWAYS HELD 9 ! PA/1 TO SUPPOSE ?AT !Y WILL HOLD 9 ! FUTURE8 ,IT HAS BE5 >GU$ ?AT WE HAVE REASON TO KN[ ?AT ! FUTURE WILL RESEMBLE ! PA/1 BECAUSE :AT WAS ! FUTURE HAS CON/ANTLY BECOME ! PA/1 & HAS ALWAYS BE5 F\ND TO RESEMBLE ! PA/1 SO ?AT WE REALLY HAVE EXP]I5CE ( ! FUTURE1 NAMELY ( TIMES :I* W]E =M]LY FUTURE1 :I* WE MAY CALL PA/ FUTURES4 ,BUT SU* AN >GUM5T REALLY BEGS ! V]Y QUE/ION AT ISSUE4 ,WE HAVE EXP]I5CE ( PA/ FUTURES1 BUT NOT ( FUTURE FUTURES1 & ! QUE/ION IS3 ,WILL FUTURE FUTURES RESEMBLE PA/ FUTURES8 ,?IS QUE/ION IS NOT TO BE ANSW]$ BY AN >GUM5T :I* />TS FROM PA/ FUTURES ALONE4 ,WE HAVE !RE=E /ILL TO SEEK = SOME PR9CIPLE :I* %ALL 5ABLE US TO KN[ ?AT ! FUTURE WILL FOLL[ ! SAME LAWS AS ! PA/4 ,! REF]5CE TO ! FUTURE 9 ?IS QUE/ION IS NOT ESS5TIAL4 ,! SAME QUE/ION >ISES :5 WE APPLY ! LAWS ?AT WORK 9 \R EXP]I5CE TO PA/ ?+S ( :I* WE HAVE NO EXP]I5CE -- AS1 = EXAMPLE1 9 GEOLOGY1 OR 9 !ORIES AS TO ! ORIG9 ( ! ,SOL> SY/EM4 ,! QUE/ION WE REALLY HAVE TO ASK IS3 ',:5 TWO ?+S HAVE BE5 F\ND TO BE (T5 ASSOCIAT$1 & NO 9/ANCE IS KN[N ( ! ONE OCCURR+ )\T ! O!R1 DOES ! OCCURR5CE ( ONE ( ! TWO1 9 A FRE% 9/ANCE1 GIVE ANY GOOD GR\ND = EXPECT+ ! O!R8' ,ON \R ANSW] TO ?IS QUE/ION MU/ DEP5D ! VALIDITY ( ! :OLE ( \R EXPECTATIONS AS TO ! FUTURE1 ! :OLE ( ! RESULTS OBTA9$ BY 9DUCTION1 & 9 FACT PRACTICALLY ALL ! BELIEFS UPON :I* \R DAILY LIFE IS BAS$4 ,IT MU/ BE CONC$$1 TO BEG9 )1 ?AT ! FACT ?AT TWO ?+S HAVE BE5 F\ND (T5 TOGE!R & NEV] AP>T DOES NOT1 BY ITSELF1 SUFFICE TO PROVE DEMON/RATIVELY ?AT !Y WILL BE F\ND TOGE!R 9 ! NEXT CASE WE EXAM9E4 ,! MO/ WE CAN HOPE IS ?AT ! (T5] ?+S >E F\ND TOGE!R1 ! MORE PROBABLE BECOMES ?AT !Y WILL BE F\ND TOGE!R ANO!R TIME1 & ?AT1 IF !Y HAVE BE5 F\ND TOGE!R (T5 5\<1 ! PROBABILITY WILL AM\NT ALMO/ TO C]TA9TY4 ,IT CAN NEV] QUITE REA* C]TA9TY1 BECAUSE WE KN[ ?AT 9 SPITE ( FREQU5T REPETITIONS !RE SOMETIMES IS A FAILURE AT ! LA/1 AS 9 ! CASE ( ! *ICK5 :OSE NECK IS WRUNG4 ,?US PROBABILITY IS ALL WE \E ADVOCAT+1 ?AT WE KN[ ALL NATURAL PH5OM5A TO BE SUBJECT TO ! REIGN ( LAW1 & ?AT SOMETIMES1 ON ! BASIS ( OBS]VATION1 WE CAN SEE ?AT ONLY ONE LAW CAN POSSIBLY FIT ! FACTS ( ! CASE4 ,N[ TO ?IS VIEW !RE >E TWO ANSW]S4 ,! FIR/ IS ?AT1 EV5 IF SOME LAW :I* HAS NO EXCEPTIONS APPLIES TO \R CASE1 WE CAN NEV]1 9 PRACTICE1 BE SURE ?AT WE HAVE DISCOV]$ ?AT LAW & NOT ONE TO :I* !RE >E EXCEPTIONS4 ,! SECOND IS ?AT ! REIGN ( LAW W\LD SEEM TO BE ITSELF ONLY PROBABLE1 & ?AT \R BELIEF ?AT IT WILL HOLD 9 ! FUTURE1 OR 9 UNEXAM9$ CASES 9 ! PA/1 IS ITSELF BAS$ UPON ! V]Y PR9CIPLE WE >E EXAM9+4 ,! PR9CIPLE WE >E EXAM9+ MAY BE CALL$ ! PR9CIPLE ( 9DUCTION1 & ITS TWO P>TS MAY BE /AT$ AS FOLL[S3 7A7 ,:5 A ?+ ( A C]TA9 SORT ,A HAS BE5 F\ND TO BE ASSOCIAT$ ) A ?+ ( A C]TA9 O!R SORT ,B1 & HAS NEV] BE5 F\ND DISSOCIAT$ FROM A ?+ ( ! SORT ,B1 ! GREAT] ! NUMB] ( CASES 9 :I* ,A & ,B HAVE BE5 ASSOCIAT$1 ! GREAT] IS ! PROBABILITY ?AT !Y WILL BE ASSOCIAT$ 9 A FRE% CASE 9 :I* ONE ( !M IS KN[N TO BE PRES5T2 7B7 ,UND] ! SAME CIRCUM/ANCES1 A SUFFICI5T NUMB] ( CASES ( ASSOCIATION WILL MAKE ! PROBABILITY ( A FRE% ASSOCIATION NE>LY A C]TA9TY1 & WILL MAKE IT APPROA* C]TA9TY )\T LIMIT4 ,AS JU/ /AT$1 ! PR9CIPLE APPLIES ONLY TO ! V]IFICATION ( \R EXPECTATION 9 A S+LE FRE% 9/ANCE4 ,BUT WE WANT ALSO TO KN[ ?AT !RE IS A PROBABILITY 9 FAVOR ( ! G5]AL LAW ?AT ?+S ( ! SORT ,A >E ALWAYS ASSOCIAT$ ) ?+S ( ! SORT ,B1 PROVID$ A SUFFICI5T NUMB] ( CASES ( ASSOCIATION >E KN[N1 & NO CASES ( FAILURE ( ASSOCIATION >E KN[N4 ,! PROBABILITY ( ! G5]AL LAW IS OBVI\SLY LESS ?AN ! PROBABILITY ( ! P>TICUL> CASE1 S9CE IF ! G5]AL LAW IS TRUE1 ! P>TICUL> CASE MU/ ALSO BE TRUE1 :]EAS ! P>TICUL> CASE MAY BE TRUE )\T ! G5]AL LAW BE+ TRUE4 ,NEV]!LESS ! PROBABILITY ( ! G5]AL LAW IS 9CREAS$ BY REPETITIONS1 JU/ AS ! PROBABILITY ( ! P>TICUL> CASE IS4 ,WE MAY !RE=E REPEAT ! TWO P>TS ( \R PR9CIPLE AS REG>DS ! G5]AL LAW1 ?US3 7A7,! GREAT] ! NUMB] ( CASES 9 :I* A ?+ ! SORT ,A HAS BE5 F\ND ASSOCIAT$ ) A ?+ ! SORT ,B1 ! MORE PROBABLE IT IS 7IF NO CASES ( FAILURE ( ASSOCIATION >E KN[N7 ?AT ,A IS ALWAYS ASSOCIAT$ ) ,B2 7B7 ,UND] ! SAME CIRCUM/ANCES1 A SUFFICI5T NUMB] ( CASES ( ! ASSOCIATION ( ,A ) ,B WILL MAKE IT NE>LY C]TA9 ?AT ,A IS ALWAYS ASSOCIAT$ ) ,B1 & WILL MAKE ?IS G5]AL LAW APPROA* C]TA9TY )\T LIMIT4 ,IT %\LD BE NOT$ ?AT PROBABILITY IS ALWAYS RELATIVE TO C]TA9 DATA4 ,9 \R CASE1 ! DATA >E M]ELY ! KN[N CASES ( COEXI/5CE ( ,A & ,B4 ,!RE MAY BE O!R DATA1 :I* MIGUE BY \R PR9CIPLE1 ?AT ON ! DATA IT WAS PROBABLE ?AT ALL SWANS W]E :ITE1 & ?IS MIGUM5T4 ,! >GUM5T IS NOT DISPROV$ BY ! FACT ?AT SOME SWANS >E BLACK1 BECAUSE A ?+ MAY V]Y WELL HAPP5 9 SPITE ( ! FACT ?AT SOME DATA R5D] IT IMPROBABLE4 ,9 ! CASE ( ! SWANS1 A MAN MIIABLE *>ACT]I/IC 9 MANY SPECIES ( ANIMALS1 & ?AT1 !RE=E1 AN 9DUCTION AS TO COLOR IS PECULI>LY LIABLE TO ]ROR4 ,BUT ?IS KN[L$GE W\LD BE A FRE% DATUM1 BY NO MEANS PROV+ ?AT ! PROBABILITY RELATIVELY TO \R PREVI\S DATA HAD BE5 WRONGLY E/IMAT$4 ,! FACT1 !RE=E1 ?AT ?+S (T5 FAIL TO FULFILL \R EXPECTATIONS IS NO EVID5CE ?AT \R EXPECTATIONS WILL NOT PROBABLY BE FULFILL$ 9 A GIV5 CASE OR A GIV5 CLASS ( CASES4 ,?US \R 9DUCTIVE PR9CIPLE IS AT ANY RATE NOT CAPABLE ( BE+ DISPROV$ BY AN APPEAL TO EXP]I5CE4 ,! 9DUCTIVE PR9CIPLE1 H[EV]1 IS EQUALLY 9CAPABLE ( BE+ PROV$ BY AN APPEAL TO EXP]I5CE4 ,EXP]I5CE MIDS ! CASES ?AT HAVE BE5 ALREADY EXAM9$2 BUT AS REG>DS UNEXAM9$ CASES1 IT IS ! 9DUCTIVE PR9CIPLE ALONE ?AT CAN JU/IFY ANY 9F]5CE FROM :AT HAS BE5 EXAM9$ TO :AT HAS NOT BE5 EXAM9$4 ,ALL >GUM5TS :I*1 ON ! BASIS ( EXP]I5CE1 >GUE AS TO ! FUTURE OR ! UNEXP]I5C$ P>TS ( ! PA/ OR PRES5T1 ASSUME ! 9DUCTIVE PR9CIPLE2 H5CE WE CAN NEV] USE EXP]I5CE TO PROVE ! 9DUCTIVE PR9CIPLE )\T BEGG+ ! QUE/ION4 ,?US WE MU/ EI!R ACCEPT ! 9DUCTIVE PR9CIPLE ON ! GR\ND ( ITS 9TR9SIC EVID5CE1 OR =GO ALL JU/IFICATION ( \R EXPECTATIONS AB\T ! FUTURE4 ,IF ! PR9CIPLE IS UNS\ND1 WE HAVE NO REASON TO EXPECT ! SUN TO RISE TO-MORR[1 TO EXPECT BREAD TO BE MORE N\RI%+ ?AN A /ONE1 OR TO EXPECT ?AT IF WE ?R[ \RSELVES (F ! RO( WE %ALL FALL4 ,:5 WE SEE :AT LOOKS LIKE \R BE/ FRI5D APPROA*+ US1 WE %ALL HAVE NO REASON TO SUPPOSE ?AT HIS BODY IS NOT 9HABIT$ BY ! M9D ( \R WOR/ 5EMY OR ( SOME TOTAL /RANG]4 ,ALL \R CONDUCT IS BAS$ UPON ASSOCIATIONS :I* HAVE WORK$ 9 ! PA/1 & :I* WE !RE=E REG>D AS LIKELY TO WORK 9 ! FUTURE2 & ?IS LIKELIHOOD IS DEP5D5T = ITS VALIDITY UPON ! 9DUCTIVE PR9CIPLE4 ,! G5]AL PR9CIPLES ( SCI5CE1 SU* AS ! BELIEF 9 ! REIGN ( LAW1 & ! BELIEF ?AT EV]Y EV5T MU/ HAVE A CAUSE1 >E AS COMPLETELY DEP5D5T UPON ! 9DUCTIVE PR9CIPLE AS >E ! BELIEFS ( DAILY LIFE ,ALL SU* G5]AL PR9CIPLES >E BELIEV$ BECAUSE MANK9D HAVE F\ND 9NUM]ABLE 9/ANCES ( !IR TRU? & NO 9/ANCES ( !IR FALSEHOOD4 ,BUT ?IS AF=DS NO EVID5CE = !IR TRU? 9 ! FUTURE1 UNLESS ! 9DUCTIVE PR9CIPLE IS ASSUM$4 ,?US ALL KN[L$GE :I*1 ON A BASIS ( EXP]I5CE TELLS US SOME?+ AB\T :AT IS NOT EXP]I5C$1 IS BAS$ UPON A BELIEF :I* EXP]I5CE CAN NEI!R CONFIRM NOR CONFUTE1 YET :I*1 AT LEA/ 9 ITS MORE CONCRETE APPLICATIONS1 APPE>S TO BE AS FIRMLY ROOT$ 9 US AS MANY ( ! FACTS ( EXP]I5CE4 ,! EXI/5CE & JU/IFICATION ( SU* BELIEFS -- = ! 9DUCTIVE PR9CIPLE1 AS WE %ALL SEE1 IS NOT ! ONLY EXAMPLE -- RAISES SOME ( ! MO/ DIFFICULT & MO/ DEBAT$ PROBLEMS ( PHILOSOPHY4 ,WE WILL1 9 ! NEXT *APT]1 CONSID] BRIEFLY :AT MAY BE SAID TO ACC\NT = SU* KN[L$GE1 & :AT IS ITS SCOPE & ITS DEGREE ( C]TA9TY4 ,*RONOLOGY 3 ,NOVEMB] #c1 #aiaa 3 ,*APT] #f -- ,PUBLICATION4 ,JANU>Y #a#f1 #bb 3 ,*APT] #f -- ,ADD$4 FILE G5]AT$ FROM 3 HTTP3_/_/REVOLTLIB4COM_/